Salesforce has become one of the top three SaaS expenses in many large enterprises. Its broad adoption across sales, service, marketing, and more means big bills for organizations – and those bills continue to grow. CIOs, CFOs, and IT leaders are under intense pressure to optimize Salesforce spend without sacrificing essential functionality.
The key to success is a blend of immediate cost-saving tactics and long-term spend discipline. In this guide, we’ll explore how to quickly trim excess Salesforce costs and, crucially, how to keep those costs under control for the long haul.
The True Drivers of Salesforce Cost Growth
Before cutting costs, it’s essential to understand why Salesforce costs tend to increase.
Several factors consistently drive Salesforce spend higher year over year:
- Escalating license prices: Salesforce frequently applies annual price uplifts (often around 5–7% per year) on license renewals or list prices. Over time, these compounded increases significantly boost your spend even if you don’t add new users. Salesforce also periodically raises list prices (as seen with recent 6–10% hikes in some editions), citing added features and inflation, so customers feel a constant upward pressure on pricing.
- Over-licensing and shelfware: It’s common for organizations to buy more licenses than they actually use. Perhaps you purchased extra seats anticipating growth that didn’t fully materialize, or you never removed licenses after employees left. This shelfware (paid-for but unused licenses) is pure waste. License counts also creep up over time (“seat creep”) when new hires automatically get licenses, but departures aren’t balanced out. Over-licensing can quietly drain your budget if not checked.
- Hidden costs beyond licenses: The subscription fee is just part of Salesforce’s cost. Storage, API usage, and add-ons can inflate the total. For example, Salesforce limits data and file storage; if you exceed these limits, you’ll incur hefty overage fees or need to purchase additional storage. High API consumption (integrations making a large number of calls) may require purchasing additional API capacity or a higher edition. New features, such as Einstein AI, Data Cloud, or other add-on modules, often come with their own usage-based fees. These costs can creep into contracts and budgets if you’re not monitoring them.
- Renewal timing and Salesforce leverage: Salesforce’s sales process is geared to maximize its advantage at renewal time. They often renew discussions when the customer has little choice but to renew, and may bundle products into “all-in” offers to boost their commitment. Without preparation, customers can be pressured into expanding the scope or accepting price increases at renewal. The structure of multi-year deals can also create spikes: you might get a first-year discount that disappears later, or contract clauses that allow Salesforce to raise prices on renewal unless you negotiated a cap. In short, the renewal cycle can be a catalyst for cost growth if you don’t actively counter it.
Understanding these drivers sets the stage for tackling them head-on. Next, we’ll dive into strategies to reverse shelfware, optimize licenses, negotiate better deals, and institute governance that keeps Salesforce costs in check.
License Optimization – The Fastest Path to Savings
The quickest wins in cost reduction come from making sure you’re only paying for what you actually use. License optimization is about eliminating waste and right-sizing your license inventory.
Here’s how to do it:
- Audit for shelfware and cut it: Start with a thorough usage audit. Identify every Salesforce user and see if they’ve logged in or used the system in the last few months. It’s common to find completely inactive accounts – people who have left the company or switched roles, or test accounts that are no longer needed. Eliminate those unused licenses immediately. You should deactivate those users and remove those licenses from your renewal count. In one enterprise, a usage audit revealed that 15% of their Salesforce licenses were assigned to people who no longer needed them. By cutting this “shelfware,” they saved 15% of their spend in one stroke. This type of cleanup is the fastest and most painless way to reduce costs.
- Right-size license tiers and editions: Not everyone needs the most expensive license type. Review the license type each active user has and compare it to their actual usage. For instance, if you’ve given every user a full Sales Cloud license but some users only view reports or update a few records, those users might be fine with a lower-cost license (such as a platform/light license or read-only access). Downgrade premium licenses where appropriate. Similarly, check if you’re on an edition (Professional, Enterprise, Unlimited) that fits your usage. E.g., if you pay for Unlimited Edition features that you aren’t using, consider moving down to the Enterprise edition at renewal for a lower price point. Align each user with the cheapest license that still meets their needs. This right-sizing can significantly trim fat.
- Reallocate licenses across teams: Large organizations often have multiple departments or business units using Salesforce. Some teams may have excess licenses (seats they’re not using), while others are requesting more. Instead of buying new licenses for Team B while Team A has extras, implement a governance where unused licenses are returned to a central pool and reassigned where needed. This way, you fulfill demand internally first. Reallocating licenses enterprise-wide prevents overbuying and ensures high utilization of each license you’re paying for.
- Optimize user access vs. license cost: In some cases, you can find alternative ways for certain users to access Salesforce data without a full license. For example, executives who only need dashboards can receive scheduled reports or use a shared view instead of having a full account for each. Alternatively, if a group only needs a Salesforce function occasionally, consider a shared login with careful security (if permitted by your agreement) or using an experience portal license for limited access. The idea is to avoid giving out $150-per-month licenses to people who don’t use them heavily.
By executing these steps, many enterprises trim 10% or more off their Salesforce spend within the first few months of effort. License optimization is the foundation of cost reduction – it tackles the low-hanging fruit. Next, we’ll examine ways to reduce costs by continuously monitoring usage.
Usage Monitoring to Eliminate Hidden Costs
Cleaning up licenses once isn’t enough; you need ongoing vigilance to prevent cost creep from less obvious angles. Salesforce usage must be monitored not only in terms of active users, but also in terms of data, integrations, and new features.
Here’s how to keep an eye on hidden cost drivers:
- Track data and API consumption: Salesforce will charge you for exceeding the data storage limit and high API usage. Set up internal dashboards or alerts for org storage levels (data and file storage) and API call volumes. If you’re approaching the free limit, it’s better to know early and clean up data or optimize integrations rather than suddenly paying overage fees. For API calls, monitor which integrations or apps are consuming the most and see if they can be made more efficient. This eliminates the need to purchase additional API capacity or higher-cost licenses due to technical inefficiencies.
- Watch new add-ons (especially AI features): Salesforce is constantly introducing new products (like Einstein AI, analytics, Data Cloud, etc.) that may be bundled into your contract or offered as trials. These can be valuable, but they also often come with usage-based costs or separate licensing after an initial trial period. Be cautious of “creeper” costs – for example, a department enables an Einstein AI feature that’s free for now, but on renewal, it becomes a paid add-on because usage has increased. Ensure that the usage of any add-on product is tracked and evaluated. If an add-on isn’t delivering clear value or high adoption, consider removing it from your contract before it racks up charges.
- Measure true adoption via dashboards: Beyond just counting logins, create a usage dashboard that tracks key adoption metrics: active users vs. total licenses, feature usage (e.g., how many users use that expensive plugin you bought), storage trends, etc. Share these metrics with both IT and business owners on a quarterly basis. This transparency lets everyone know what’s being used and what’s not. It enables proactive decisions – like turning off features nobody uses, training users on underutilized tools (to justify their cost), or removing licenses from teams that aren’t using them effectively. When you have hard data on usage, you can eliminate waste systematically and avoid “hidden” costs catching you by surprise.
Continuous usage monitoring turns cost optimization from a one-time project into a habit. It’s an essential part of keeping Salesforce spend under control, especially as you add new functionalities. Armed with data, you can confidently enter renewal discussions, which brings us to the next topic: negotiation tactics.
Contract & Renewal Negotiation Tactics
When renewal time approaches, Salesforce’s sales team will be eager to upsell and increase your spend.
With the right negotiation strategies, you can turn the tables and secure savings or favorable terms.
Consider the following tactics well before your Salesforce renewal date:
- Start renewal preparation 9–12 months in advance: Don’t wait until a month before your contract expires to plan your strategy. Begin 9-12 months in advance by reviewing your current usage (from the monitoring above), identifying what you need going forward, and what you don’t. Early preparation gives you the luxury of time – time to engage other vendors for benchmarking, time to let Salesforce know you’re not rushed (so they can’t play the clock against you), and time to escalate internally for approvals on any changes. Companies that start early often secure better discounts and terms because they can methodically push back on proposals and explore alternatives.
- Benchmark discounts and demand transparency: Knowledge is power in negotiation. Reach out to industry peers or consultants, or use internal procurement data, to benchmark typical Salesforce discounts for companies of your size and spend. If you’re paying list price or getting a trivial discount, you know there’s room to push for more. When negotiating, ask Salesforce to provide a detailed breakdown of your costs and how any new pricing is derived. Demand transparency – make them explain any price increases or added costs. By demonstrating your knowledge of the market and the value of your account, you pressure Salesforce to offer a competitive deal rather than an inflated one.
- Secure price caps and flexible terms: One of the most important clauses you can negotiate is a cap on price increases for future renewals. For example, negotiate a clause that limits any annual price increase to, say, 3-5% or even a flat freeze for a couple of years. This protects you from large jumps later. Additionally, seek flexible terms like ramp-up or ramp-down rights. A ramp clause might allow you to start with fewer licenses and add more at the same discounted rate as you roll out to more users (so you’re not paying for everyone from day one). Conversely, you could seek the right to reduce licenses by a certain percentage if your company’s needs shrink (this one is harder to get, but even an agreed “give-back” of 5-10% of licenses without penalty can be valuable if you’re signing a big contract). Also, try to insert benchmarking rights – e.g., if Salesforce later offers deeper discounts to similar customers, you get an adjustment. These contractual protections ensure the deal stays good for you, not just at signing but over its life.
- Push back on bundled “all-in” deals: When Salesforce knows you use multiple products (Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud, etc.), they might propose a mega-deal – a single, multi-product bundle with a huge total commitment. Be cautious with these all-in-one proposals. Often, they include some products you may not fully use or need, essentially inflating your cost with nice-to-haves. It may also lock all your products together, reducing flexibility to drop something later. Don’t be afraid to say “no” to unwanted components. Instead, insist on pricing each cloud or product separately. You can still buy multiple products, but by keeping them individually priced, you maintain clarity on each item’s cost and value. Only bundle if the economics are truly better and you are sure you will use everything in the bundle.
- Separate negotiations by product/cloud: In line with avoiding overly bundled deals, consider negotiating different Salesforce products on separate tracks. Suppose your Sales Cloud (CRM) is mission-critical, but your Marketing Cloud usage is lighter or has viable alternatives. In that case, it might make sense to renew Sales Cloud for a longer term but put Marketing Cloud on a shorter term or even consider competing products. Salesforce reps might try to tie them together, but you can often get better leverage by treating them separately – possibly even working with different specialist reps for each product. This way, you can play hardball on a less critical product without jeopardizing the must-have portion. It also introduces competitive tension (e.g., hint that you might switch your marketing automation to another vendor if Salesforce doesn’t sharpen the pencil). In essence, de-aggregate the deal so you have multiple smaller negotiations rather than one take-it-or-leave-it big bang.
Using these tactics, enterprises have secured significant renewal savings – from larger discounts, to hard caps on future increases, to free add-on licenses or support services as sweeteners. The key is to approach Salesforce renewal as a planned negotiation, not a clerical renewal. Next up: deciding on contract length, another major factor in determining cost.
Multi-Year vs. Annual Deals – Which Cuts Costs Long-Term?
A big strategic decision is whether to commit to a multi-year Salesforce agreement or renew year-to-year. Each approach has pros and cons for cost management:
- Advantages of multi-year contracts: Multi-year deals (typically 3-year commitments, sometimes longer) can lock in pricing and secure larger discounts. Salesforce is more willing to give, say, a 20% discount if you commit for 3 years versus just 1 year. This provides budget predictability – you know your Salesforce costs for the next few years and can avoid the worry of annual price hikes. Multi-year agreements also strengthen your negotiating position to secure extras, such as guaranteed support levels or free training credits, as Salesforce sees a longer revenue stream. In short, if you’re confident your Salesforce usage will remain steady or grow, a multi-year contract can yield better pricing and stability.
- Drawbacks of multi-year deals: The flip side of a long contract is reduced flexibility. You are locked into a certain number of licenses and products for the duration, even if your needs change. Suppose your company undergoes layoffs, divestitures, or decides to scale back a project that uses Salesforce. In that case, you typically cannot reduce your license count until the multi-year term is over. This can lead to paying for shelfware (unused licenses) you no longer need – a costly waste. Additionally, if a competitor (or Salesforce itself) offers innovation or new pricing next year, you might miss out because you’re locked in. Essentially, multi-year = “locked-in marriage” to the initial deal, for better or worse.
- Benefits of annual renewals: Opting for a 1-year term (annual renewal) maximizes your flexibility. Each year you can adjust the quantity of licenses and even which products you subscribe to. This means you can scale down if needed or swap in a new solution if something better/cheaper comes along in a year. Annual terms also keep Salesforce on its toes – they have to win your business again each year, which can motivate it to avoid complacency and perhaps offer competitive pricing to persuade you to renew. You won’t get the big multi-year discount, but you also aren’t tied down. For organizations in fast-changing environments or uncertain growth situations, annual deals let you stay agile.
- Hybrid approaches and best of both: It doesn’t have to be all-or-nothing. Some enterprises use a hybrid strategy: commit to a multi-year contract for a core, stable set of licenses (ensuring a good discount on the bulk of your needs), but keep certain add-on products or excess capacity on a shorter term. Another hybrid tactic is staggering contract end-dates for different components. For example, your Sales Cloud could be on a 3-year term ending in 2026, but Marketing Cloud on an agreement ending in 2025. This way, not all your services renew at once – you always have something coming up for renewal where you can leverage competitive pressure and avoid being completely locked in everywhere simultaneously. Additionally, if you do sign multi-year, try to negotiate mid-term adjustment clauses (like the ability to drop, say, 5-10% of licenses in year 2 or 3 if they’re not being used, or the ability to add more at the same discount rate). These clauses can provide some flexibility within a long contract.
Which is right for you? If cost predictability and maximum discount are top priority – and you’re confident in your Salesforce usage projections – a multi-year deal with protective clauses is a strong choice. If flexibility and the option to course-correct annually matter more, you might favor annual renewals despite slightly higher per-year costs. Many large organizations actually combine these approaches to strike a balance between savings and agility.
Leveraging Competitive Alternatives
Salesforce knows it’s a leader, but it’s rarely your only option. Introducing credible competition into the mix is one of the most powerful levers for reducing costs.
The idea is to show Salesforce that you could take your business elsewhere if needed – compelling them to offer better pricing to keep you.
Here’s how to do it effectively:
- Get quotes from other platforms: Identify the top alternatives relevant to your Salesforce usage. For CRM, options include Microsoft Dynamics 365 or Oracle CX. For specific workflow or platform capabilities, consider ServiceNow or even industry-specific CRM solutions. Engage with those vendors and solicit a ballpark proposal or quote. You don’t necessarily have to go through a full RFP, but you should have enough information to include numbers and possibly even a demo. If Salesforce’s sales team sees that you have a viable Plan B (with pricing attached), they will be far more inclined to sharpen their pencil.
- Create a credible switching scenario: It’s not enough to name-drop a competitor – you need to show credibility. This could involve conducting a pilot project on a small scale with a competitor or, at the very least, demonstrating an internal analysis of moving off Salesforce. For example, consider testing Microsoft Dynamics with a small sales team or migrating one business function to a more affordable CRM to assess its effectiveness. Then, when talking to Salesforce, you can reference this pilot or evaluation. Your goal is to politely let them know, “We have done our homework, and we can shift to Vendor X if needed.” Even if you ultimately prefer to stay with Salesforce, the mere fact that you have put in effort to consider alternatives makes Salesforce more likely to concede on price.
- Maintain leverage without burning bridges: Use the competition card carefully. Be firm that you have alternatives, but avoid antagonistic ultimatums. The tone can be, “We prefer to continue with Salesforce, but given budget pressures, we must consider other options. We have a proposal from Competitor Y that is very compelling. Is there any way Salesforce can help us match our budget goals?” This signals that Salesforce could lose some or all of your business. In many cases, this results in Salesforce offering last-minute discounts or incentives to close the renewal. For instance, a global manufacturer managed to secure an extra 10% off their Salesforce renewal quote after presenting Salesforce with a detailed cost comparison of Dynamics 365 versus Salesforce tailored to their specific needs – they didn’t actually switch, but the threat was credible enough to secure that price reduction.
- Don’t bluff – be ready to follow through: It should go without saying, but don’t make threats you can’t carry out. If you claim you’ll move to a competitor, be prepared that Salesforce might call that bluff. Always have genuine intent and executive buy-in, so that you can migrate a part of your business if Salesforce doesn’t cooperate. Even migrating a portion of your usage (e.g., one department to another CRM) can be a viable strategy to save costs if Salesforce refuses to deal. In any case, by seriously exploring competitors, you put yourself in a win-win position: either you get a better Salesforce deal, or you find a cheaper solution elsewhere.
Using competitive pressure is a classic negotiation tactic in the enterprise software industry. The specter of losing revenue often motivates Salesforce to offer concessions, as it recognizes that switching CRM systems can be a complex process. If a customer is willing to consider it, they’re serious about cost. Leverage that to your advantage.
Implementation & Support Optimization
Not all Salesforce-related costs are directly attributed to licenses or contracts. A significant portion can be tied up in how you implement and maintain Salesforce in your organization.
Optimizing your Salesforce usage from a technical and support standpoint can lead to substantial savings and efficiency gains:
- Avoid over-customization: Salesforce is a powerful platform with numerous out-of-the-box functionalities. If your company has treated it like a blank canvas – heavily customizing it with code, bespoke features, and complex workflows – you might find you’re spending huge sums on developers or consultants to maintain that complexity. Over-customization also makes upgrades and new feature adoption harder (sometimes requiring more paid support). The advice is to favor configuration over customization. Utilize Salesforce’s native capabilities and best-practice configurations whenever possible. Every custom code or unusual workaround you eliminate is one less thing to fix or pay someone to manage later. By keeping your Salesforce implementation simpler and closer to standard, you can significantly reduce the ongoing cost of ownership.
- Build in-house expertise vs. relying on SIs: Many enterprises lean on systems integrators (SIs) or external Salesforce consulting firms for everything – from initial deployment to minor enhancements. These firms can be very expensive (often charging high hourly rates). To cut costs, invest in training your own administrators and developers on Salesforce. An internal Salesforce Center of Excellence or just a couple of certified staff members can handle a lot of the work that you might otherwise outsource. They become familiar with your org and can often solve problems faster and more cheaply than an external consultant who has to ramp up. Reserve external consultants for truly specialized needs or major projects, and handle the day-to-day enhancements and support internally. In-house expertise not only saves money, it also builds organizational self-reliance and quicker turnaround on requests.
- Consolidate orgs and optimize environments: Over time, some companies end up with multiple Salesforce orgs (instances) – for example, after acquisitions, or separate orgs for different divisions and projects. Each organization may incur duplicate costs, including separate license pools, multiple integrations, and potentially even multiple support contracts. Evaluate whether you can consolidate into a single organization (or fewer organizations). While consolidation is a project in itself, the long-term savings from centralized administration and avoiding double payments for licenses (e.g., the same user needing two licenses for two organizations) can be substantial. Likewise, examine your sandbox and testing environments: are you paying for extra sandboxes or features in non-production organizations that you don’t actually need? You might be able to downsize the number of sandboxes or the level of sandbox (Salesforce charges for Full Copy sandboxes, for instance, which you might not need for all projects). Rationalizing your Salesforce environments can reduce overhead and sometimes license counts.
- Streamline integrations and third-party add-ons: Every integration between Salesforce and another system can incur maintenance work and potential costs (some integration platforms or middleware have fees, and heavy integration usage can drive up those Salesforce API costs as mentioned earlier). Similarly, if you’ve installed third-party add-ons from the AppExchange, review those carefully – some have subscription fees that add to your spend. It may be beneficial to reduce the number of moving parts. For instance, if two systems both integrate with Salesforce and have overlapping data, consider eliminating one of the integrations. Or if you pay for a third-party app (like a data cleansing tool or document generation tool), check if Salesforce has introduced similar functionality natively or if you can accomplish the task with a simpler approach. Simplifying your Salesforce ecosystem not only saves on direct costs (fewer apps to pay for, fewer integration licenses), but also indirect costs (less time troubleshooting complex systems, fewer consultants needed to manage exotic setups).
By optimizing how you implement and support Salesforce, you essentially lower the cost of each license’s value. You get more out of what you pay, and you avoid the ancillary expenses that often make Salesforce projects go over budget. Simplicity and self-sufficiency are your friends when it comes to cost management.
Governance Frameworks for Sustainable Cost Control
Quick fixes yield savings now, but sustained cost reduction demands governance. In other words, you need the right processes and ownership in place to manage Salesforce spend effectively and continuously. Establishing a governance framework ensures that the cost optimizations you achieve don’t gradually slip away.
Consider building these elements into your Salesforce governance:
- Centralize license ownership and tracking: Determine who (an individual or team) is responsible for managing Salesforce licenses across the organization. A central authority – for example, the IT asset management team or a dedicated CRM administrator – should maintain the definitive count of licenses, who has them, and how they’re used. When a group requires additional licenses or wishes to purchase a new Salesforce add-on, it should submit its request through this central team rather than directly to Salesforce. Central ownership prevents rogue spending and enables bulk negotiations. It also means someone has the full picture of your Salesforce footprint at all times.
- Enforce regular usage audits: Make usage audits a scheduled routine. For instance, quarterly or at least twice a year, have the central team (with cooperation from business unit admins) review all user accounts and feature usage. Set policies like “Any user inactive for 90 days gets reviewed for deactivation” or “Any app or feature not used by a department in six months gets evaluated for removal.” By institutionalizing these audits, you ensure shelfware cleanup isn’t a one-time activity but an ongoing discipline. People in the organization will also become accustomed to it. E.g., managers know that if they don’t have their team use a feature, it might be removed to save costs, which can encourage the adoption of useful tools or the agreement to drop unused ones.
- Approval process for new spend and add-ons: Break the pattern of automatically purchasing new Salesforce products or upgrading at the moment a department requests them. Implement a governance rule that any request for additional licenses or new Salesforce modules/add-ons must be evaluated. Typically, this means the requesting team provides a business case or justification, and the central Salesforce governance team checks a few things: Do we already have unused licenses that can cover this? Is there an existing feature that meets the need without buying a new add-on? Is this request truly aligned with our business priorities? Only after passing this review does the purchase proceed. This gatekeeper function curbs impulsive spending and makes sure every dollar spent on Salesforce aligns with genuine needs and strategic value.
- Tie usage to accountability: A subtle yet powerful governance practice is to hold departments financially or operationally accountable for the Salesforce licenses and features they utilize. For example, charge back the cost of licenses to each department’s budget based on actual assignments. When teams see a line item for Salesforce in their own budget, they tend to be more mindful of not hoarding licenses or requesting more than necessary. Additionally, report on adoption metrics by department: if one team has 50 licenses but only 30 active users, bring this to management’s attention in meetings. By tying cost to accountability and transparency, you create a culture where everyone knows that Salesforce’s spending is being closely monitored. It’s not about punishing anyone – it’s about partnership with business units to ensure funds are well-used. Over time, this cultural shift can be one of the most effective ways to prevent cost bloat.
A strong governance framework turns cost management from a one-off project into an embedded practice. With centralized control, regular audits, approval gates, and shared accountability, your organization will naturally maintain lean and controlled Salesforce costs.
Quick Wins – Cost Reductions You Can Apply Today
While big-picture strategies and governance are crucial, what about immediate actions you can take right now? Here are some quick-win cost cuts that can start saving money within days or weeks:
- Deactivate inactive users: Check your list of Salesforce users for anyone who hasn’t logged in for the last 30, 60, or 90 days. Often, you’ll discover former employees or team members who no longer need access. Deactivating each inactive user frees up a license. You can either drop that license count at renewal or reallocate it to someone else who needs it (avoiding a new purchase). This is a zero-impact way to reduce waste – no one will miss an account they weren’t using!
- Reassign underutilized licenses: Identify users with low activity (e.g., logging in only once a month or holding very limited roles). Discuss with their managers whether those users truly need a full license. In some cases, you may need to shift that person to a “shared” team account or have them rely on reports/email instead of direct Salesforce use. The free license can then be given to a new hire or a power user who legitimately needs it. By reassigning licenses in this manner, you avoid purchasing additional licenses for new requirements. Make this a habit whenever someone leaves or changes roles – don’t automatically keep giving them a Salesforce seat unless it’s justified.
- Eliminate duplicate or redundant tools: Do an application inventory around your Salesforce ecosystem. It’s common to accumulate third-party plugins or external software that overlap with Salesforce capabilities. For example, if you’re paying for a separate analytics or reporting tool, check if Salesforce’s built-in reports/dashboards can now serve the purpose (Salesforce has improved its analytics over time). Or perhaps you have a third-party form or e-signature app, but Salesforce has introduced similar functionality. By consolidating onto Salesforce’s native features, you can often drop the extra subscription costs of those add-ons. Conversely, if the third-party tool is essential and superior, consider whether you can eliminate a redundant Salesforce module. The goal is not to pay twice for similar functions. Every app you eliminate is one less bill and often means simpler integration, too.
- Clean up data and reduce storage costs: Salesforce storage fees can be a significant expense. A quick win is to delete or archive old data that you no longer need in Salesforce. Export and archive old cases, past years’ closed opportunities, or outdated leads that serve no purpose. Similarly, remove large email attachments or files that are no longer relevant. Salesforce’s storage pricing means that trimming a few gigabytes of data could save you from having to buy a pricey storage add-on. Housekeeping is the area that directly saves money.
- Audit sandbox usage: If you’re paying for additional sandbox environments or higher-tier sandboxes (like Full Copy sandboxes), assess if they’re all necessary. Perhaps you purchased extra for a large project that’s now complete, or you can downgrade a Full sandbox to a less expensive Partial Copy if it’s not heavily utilized. Reducing sandbox count or level can save on your Salesforce bill without impacting production at all – just ensure you take backups or migrate any needed test data before deletion or downgrade.
Each of these quick wins might save what seems like a small amount individually, but they can add up to a significant amount of money. More importantly, they instill a cost-conscious mindset. When your team becomes accustomed to regularly removing unused users here and shutting off unnecessary apps there, it becomes part of the culture to keep Salesforce lean.
Long-Term Salesforce Cost Reduction Strategy
Having slashed the easy costs and instituted some governance, how do you ensure Salesforce spending stays optimized in the long run? It requires treating Salesforce cost management as an ongoing strategy, not a one-time project.
Here are the pillars of a long-term cost reduction strategy:
- Manage Salesforce as a strategic supplier: Think of Salesforce like you would a major supplier or partner, not just another IT tool. This means regular business reviews with Salesforce’s account team, staying informed about their product roadmap and pricing changes, and maintaining a constructive relationship. By engaging year-round (not just at renewal), you can often stay ahead of the curve – for example, you might learn of upcoming price changes or new editions in advance and adjust your plans accordingly. Treating the relationship strategically also means Salesforce will take your concerns seriously; if they see you as a key, informed customer, they are more likely to accommodate special requests or negotiate reasonably to keep you satisfied.
- Incorporate license management into annual planning: Include a review of Salesforce usage and costs in each budget cycle or annual planning round. Set targets or KPIs around Salesforce spend, such as cost per active user, or percentage of licenses in use, and track those over time. If you’re expanding a team, plan how to cover their CRM needs within existing licenses first. If you’re launching a new project on Salesforce, factor in the license costs upfront and consider if something else can be retired to offset it. The idea is to avoid surprises: everyone should know that part of planning a new initiative is asking “Do we have Salesforce capacity for this, or how will we optimize to afford it?” Making this part of the routine ensures cost control is baked into growth, not an afterthought.
- Align IT, procurement, and finance on cost governance: Long-term savings occur when multiple stakeholders collaborate. IT knows usage and technical needs, procurement knows negotiation and contracts, and finance knows budgeting and ROI. Bring these three together regularly (e.g., a quarterly meeting specifically focused on major software/SaaS spend, such as Salesforce). During these meetings, review the current spend versus the budget, upcoming renewals, and any identified inefficiencies. For example, IT might report “200 licenses are underused,” procurement says “renewal is in 6 months, we should start strategy now,” and finance says “we need to reduce next year’s cost by 10%.” Together, they can agree on actions (IT to optimize licenses, procurement to negotiate better terms, finance to allocate savings elsewhere or approve certain investments). This cross-functional approach prevents siloed decisions that increase costs and ensures cost-saving opportunities aren’t missed due to a lack of communication.
- Continuously educate and communicate: Lastly, maintaining a culture of cost awareness means keeping Salesforce cost optimization on the radar. Share wins (e.g., “We saved $500k by eliminating unused licenses!”) with executives and teams to reinforce the importance. Educate new project leaders or app owners on how Salesforce licensing works, enabling them to make informed choices. Keep your Salesforce architecture and license allocations documentation current – so if someone proposes a new integration or purchase, you can quickly assess the impact. Essentially, make Salesforce cost management part of the organizational knowledge base. Over the years, this pays off as everyone from a sales manager adding a user to a CIO considering a new Salesforce product will instinctively consider the cost implications and alternatives.
In summary, the long-term strategy is about embedding cost discipline into every aspect of Salesforce operations. When you consistently manage Salesforce with an eye on value for money, you’ll not only cut out waste, but also get more out of the platform for every dollar spent.
Related articles
- Salesforce License Optimization: How to Eliminate Shelfware and Save Money
- Salesforce Discounts: How SMBs and Enterprises Should Approach Them Differently
FAQ – Cutting Salesforce Costs
Q: What’s the fastest way to reduce Salesforce costs?
A: The fastest, most impactful step is to target shelfware – audit your Salesforce usage and immediately eliminate any unused licenses. By turning off and not renewing licenses that are not in use, you can save a significant amount of money right away. Many companies can trim 10% or more of their licenses in a quick sweep without any loss of functionality. Alongside that, look for any obvious overpayments (such as redundant third-party add-ons or paying for an edition with features you don’t use) and eliminate them. These actions provide instant savings within the current budget year.
Q: Can I renegotiate my Salesforce agreement mid-contract?
A: Not easily. When you sign a Salesforce contract for a set term (e.g., 1 year or multi-year), you are generally committed to that spend for the duration. Salesforce contracts don’t have built-in flexibility to reduce licenses or costs mid-term – you’ve agreed to pay for X licenses until the contract ends. That said, if circumstances change drastically (for example, your company experiences a major downturn or divestiture), it’s worth discussing with your Salesforce account manager. In rare cases, they might offer some relief (like a service credit or a swap of products) to maintain goodwill, but there’s no guarantee. On the other hand, you can often increase or add products mid-contract (Salesforce will happily sell you more). Still, these additions will usually co-terminate with your original term and increase your spend. Bottom line: plan your negotiations for renewal time when you have leverage. Mid-contract, focus on using what you have efficiently, as you’re already paying for it.
Q: Should I ever sign a multi-year deal for savings?
A: Yes, in the right situations. Multi-year deals are a proven way to unlock bigger discounts and protect against yearly price hikes – if you’re confident in your forward needs. If Salesforce is core to your business and you foresee the same or growing usage over the next three years or more, a multi-year agreement can yield substantial savings and provide budget certainty. Just be sure to negotiate protections (like price caps and some flexibility to adjust if possible). On the other hand, if your needs are uncertain or you’re considering migrating away from Salesforce, you wouldn’t want to lock in long-term. In summary: use multi-year deals as a tool when you want stability and have predictable growth, and avoid them when you need flexibility or are unsure about sticking with the platform.
Q: How do I avoid paying for shelfware long-term?
A: The key is ongoing vigilance and process. Implement regular license audits (e.g., quarterly) to identify unused licenses and remove them promptly before they remain unused for years. Assign someone to continuously monitor license utilization. Also, integrate this into employee offboarding – whenever someone leaves, there should be a checklist item to evaluate and free up their Salesforce license. On a broader level, maintain a centralized license inventory and avoid allowing individual teams to stockpile extra licenses “just in case.” By governing new license requests and holding teams accountable for what they have, shelfware will struggle to accumulate. In short, treat licenses as a shared, managed resource – track usage, reclaim unused ones, and you’ll avoid the shelfware bloat that plagues so many companies.
Q: What’s a realistic percentage of savings to target on Salesforce spend?
A: It depends on your starting point, but many enterprises can achieve 10–20% savings in the first year of a concerted cost-reduction effort. That typically comes from the one-time cleanup of unused licenses, dropping unneeded add-ons, and negotiating a better discount at renewal. After that, the goal is often to contain growth – for example, if your business usage grows, you aim to keep the Salesforce spend increase lower than that (doing more with the same spend). With strong governance, some companies manage to keep their Salesforce costs flat for several years, even as they expand usage, by continuously reallocating and optimizing resources. As a rule of thumb, achieving immediate savings of over 10% is very achievable for most, and then aiming for low single-digit percentage savings (or cost avoidance) year over year by staying on top of optimization is recommended. If you were very bloated, you might even cut 30% or more, but that’s more of an exception than the norm. The most important thing is to make savings sustainable – a one-time 15% cut is great, but not if it creeps back next year. Set a realistic target and build the processes to sustain it.
Cutting Salesforce costs requires effort and coordination, but the payoff is well worth it. By taking both short-term actions and building long-term cost discipline, enterprises can rein in one of their biggest software expenses.
The result is not just a lower bill, but a leaner, more efficient Salesforce deployment that delivers high value for every dollar spent. With the strategies outlined in this guide, you can confidently take control of your Salesforce spend and redirect those savings to other strategic priorities – all while continuing to empower your teams with the capabilities they need from Salesforce.
Read more about our Salesforce Contract Negotiation Service.
