Managing Salesforce Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
License fees are only the tip of the iceberg. Many enterprises sign a Salesforce contract focusing solely on the per-user license costs, only to find later that the true total cost of ownership (TCO) is much higher.
Hidden expenses for integrations, customizations, support, and add-ons often lurk beneath the surface. Managing Salesforce TCO requires examining every cost driver in your CRM ecosystem, not just licenses.
A disciplined, full-TCO framework provides CIOs and procurement leaders with financial control and value assurance, ensuring Salesforce investments stay on budget and deliver ROI, rather than surprises.
Calculating Salesforce’s True Total Cost
When calculating Salesforce’s true total cost of ownership, take a broad view of all cost components.
A robust Salesforce cost framework extends beyond subscription fees to encompass all expenses incurred throughout the system’s lifecycle. Key cost drivers to map include:
- License Subscription Fees: The obvious direct cost – typically a per-user, per-month fee for Salesforce products (Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, etc.) or add-on modules. This is often budgeted upfront, but remember it’s a recurring operating expense that can grow as you add users or products.
- Implementation & Customization: The upfront project costs to deploy Salesforce to your needs. This includes partner consulting fees or internal development effort for initial configuration, custom code, data migration, and process design. It’s typically a large, one-time (CapEx) investment that can vary significantly based on complexity.
- Integration Costs: Expenses to connect Salesforce with other enterprise systems (ERP, marketing platforms, databases). This may involve middleware or APIs, as well as developer time to build integrations and ongoing maintenance of those connections. Integrations often require continuous updates and testing whenever either side changes.
- Support & Administration: Ongoing costs to support users and maintain the system. This could include internal admin and developer salaries, as well as fees for managed services. Additionally, many enterprises purchase Salesforce Premier Support or Success Plans (often 20–30% of the license cost) to receive faster support responses, which significantly adds to annual costs.
- Training & User Adoption: The investment in training materials, workshops, and ongoing user support to ensure employees actually use Salesforce effectively. Initial training during rollout, refresher sessions for new features, and onboarding for new hires are essential costs. If you skimp on training, adoption suffers – leading to wasted license spend.
- AppExchange Apps & Add-Ons: Third-party solutions from the Salesforce AppExchange (or additional Salesforce modules) often carry their own subscription fees. For example, you might install an e-signature app, a data backup tool, or industry-specific packages – each with monthly/annual costs. These “hidden” software subscriptions can accumulate quickly as departments add new apps.
- Data Storage & API Usage: Salesforce includes a limited amount of data and file storage in your license. As your CRM data grows (including accounts, contacts, attachments, and logs), you may encounter these limits. Extra data storage blocks are expensive (e.g., purchasing additional GBs of storage for an additional monthly fee). Similarly, heavy integrations that exceed daily API call limits may require an upgrade to higher-tier licenses or the purchase of additional API capacity. These costs often catch companies off guard.
- Ongoing Maintenance & Enhancements: Beyond initial implementation, maintaining Salesforce is an ongoing expense. This covers periodic enhancements or new customizations as business needs evolve, as well as the effort to test and adapt to Salesforce’s thrice-yearly updates. Over time, you might need to refactor custom code, update workflows, or address performance issues – all of which consume time and budget continuously.
CapEx vs OpEx: It’s useful to distinguish one-time capital expenditures versus recurring operating costs in your TCO analysis. Initial project costs (implementation, major custom build-outs, data migration) are often CapEx – large upfront investments that can be budgeted as a project.
However, the majority of Salesforce TCO manifests as OpEx, comprising recurring subscriptions (licenses and apps), support contracts, cloud storage fees, and staff salaries that recur year after year.
CIOs should anticipate that, beyond the upfront project, Salesforce requires ongoing operating expenditure to keep it running optimally. In budgeting, plan not just for the “go-live” costs, but for a sustainable annual run rate that covers licenses and the less visible costs outlined above.
By calculating Salesforce TCO across all these categories, enterprises get a realistic picture of what they’ll spend over a 3-5 year horizon.
Often, this comprehensive view reveals that the license fee is just a fraction of the total – sometimes only 50% or less of the total cost over 5 years. With this full cost framework, you can make informed decisions and avoid underestimating the investment.
Hidden Operational Costs — What Most Enterprises Miss
Even savvy organizations can overlook some hidden Salesforce costs that don’t appear in the initial proposal. These operational costs tend to creep in over time, and without scrutiny, they can blow your budget.
Here are common hidden expenses enterprises miss:
- Customization & Developer Effort: Salesforce’s great strength is its customizability – you can tailor it extensively. But every custom flow, code script (Apex), or Lightning component you build has a cost. Many companies budget for the initial build but often overlook the ongoing costs of maintaining that custom work. As processes change or Salesforce updates roll out, custom code can break or require tweaks, resulting in additional developer hours. If you rely heavily on consultants or contractors for these changes, costs balloon. Customizations also add complexity that can slow projects and require future rework (the technical debt of quick fixes can come due later).
- Third-Party App Fees: Installing an AppExchange package might solve a niche problem overnight, but each comes with its own price tag. It’s easy for departments to add a marketing plugin here, a quoting tool there – each at a cost of maybe $5, $10, or $20 per user per month. Individually, they seem minor, but an enterprise might wake up to discover it’s paying hundreds of thousands per year on a patchwork of add-on tools. Worse, some functionality may duplicate what you’re already paying for elsewhere. These extra apps also often require their own admin attention and support.
- Storage and API Overages: Data growth is a silent budget-killer. Salesforce’s included storage (e.g. 10 GB of data storage + some MBs per user) often suffices in year one. However, by year three or four, large enterprises often exceed these limits due to the accumulation of customer data, case histories, email attachments, and documents. Additional Salesforce data storage can cost hundreds of dollars per month per additional 500 MB, a rate vastly higher than generic cloud storage – a rude shock for CFOs. Similarly, hitting Salesforce’s API call limits isn’t an everyday occurrence, but if your CRM is heavily integrated (think real-time syncs with an ERP, e-commerce, etc.), you may suddenly be forced to upgrade to a higher edition or purchase additional API capacity. These overage costs don’t appear until you’re in production and growing.
- Ongoing Workflow & Integration Maintenance: After go-live, the work isn’t over – in fact, it’s just beginning. Every quarter, Salesforce pushes new releases. Every year, your business processes change and adjacent systems evolve. That means the integrations you’ve built and the automations you’ve configured require regular maintenance. Many enterprises underestimate the effort required to continuously test and fix integrations or workflows. For instance, an external system’s API might change, requiring updates to the Salesforce integration. Alternatively, a new Salesforce feature could enable a process to be completed more efficiently, prompting a redesign of existing configurations. If you don’t allocate resources for this continuous maintenance, you risk broken processes or costly emergency fixes down the line.
- User Adoption and Inefficiencies: A more subtle, yet hidden, cost arises from low user adoption or poorly aligned processes. If your sales reps or service agents aren’t fully using Salesforce (perhaps due to poor training or clunky custom UX), you’re effectively paying for unused capacity. Unused or under-utilized licenses are wasted money. Moreover, if processes in Salesforce are not streamlined, users may spend extra time (incurring labor costs) or revert to manual work outside the system, thereby undermining the ROI. Some companies end up investing in re-training, coaching, or process re-engineering to boost adoption, which are additional costs attributable to getting full value from the Salesforce investment. While not a direct fee, the opportunity cost of an under-utilized Salesforce implementation can be huge.
The lesson: anticipate these hidden operational costs. By recognizing that customization comes with lifecycle costs, that storage and support aren’t truly “free,” and that maintaining integrations is an ongoing duty, you can bake these into your TCO planning.
Most importantly, you can take proactive steps (such as archiving old data to less expensive storage or monitoring app usage) to mitigate unexpected expenses.
Regular Cost Reviews — Keeping Salesforce Spend in Check
The best way to avoid Salesforce cost surprises is to institute regular cost reviews. Treat your Salesforce org like you would a financial portfolio – it needs periodic audits and rebalancing to stay healthy. Many enterprises that manage Salesforce TCO effectively have a cadence (quarterly, biannual, or at least annual) for reviewing all aspects of their spend and usage.
Here’s how to keep your Salesforce spend in check:
- Scheduled TCO Audits: Conduct formal TCO reviews on a set schedule – for example, a quick quarterly check and a deep annual review. In these audits, gather all relevant cost data, including license counts and spend, support fees, third-party app subscriptions, and extra storage charges. Compare the current period against previous periods and against your budget. This exercise often uncovers anomalies, like a spike in app spending or rising storage fees, early enough to address them. It also fosters accountability by making costs visible to stakeholders regularly, not just at renewal time.
- License Alignment and Optimization: A common outcome of cost reviews is the need to realign your licenses with actual usage. Examine how many licenses you’ve purchased vs. how many users are actively using the system. It’s not unusual to find dozens (or, for large firms, hundreds) of unused or underutilized licenses sitting idle – perhaps due to staff turnover or departments purchasing more than they needed. Reclaim these licenses immediately: Salesforce allows license reallocation, so assign unused seats to new users instead of purchasing additional licenses. If you still have surplus licenses at renewal, consider downgrading or retiring them to avoid renewing them. Also, consider license types – some users may be on a costly full license but only use a fraction of the features. For example, if certain team members only need read-only access or basic functionality, consider cheaper license types (such as platform or read-only licenses) for them. Aligning license volume and type to actual needs can trim significant fat from your Salesforce bill.
- App & Feature Rationalization: Over time, Salesforce organizations accumulate extras – perhaps an AppExchange package added for a specific project or a pilot of a new Salesforce add-on that is only used by one department. Use the cost review to catalogue all third-party apps and add-on subscriptions you’re paying for. Then critically evaluate: which apps are truly providing value and which are redundant or rarely used? You might find, for instance, that two departments bought separate project management plugins that could be consolidated into one, or that a fancy analytics add-on isn’t being looked at by anyone anymore. Decide which to keep and which to cut. Canceling a few underutilized app subscriptions or eliminating overlapping tools can save tens of thousands of dollars annually. Likewise, review Salesforce platform features – if you’re paying for additional sandboxes, premium support, or extra modules, ensure you’re using them fully; otherwise consider scaling back if possible.
- KPI Dashboard for Usage and ROI: To support these reviews, build a cost-and-usage dashboard that leadership can monitor. Key metrics might include: license utilization rate (percentage of purchased licenses actively used), user login/activity trends, storage usage vs capacity, number of installed apps, and support ticket volumes. You can also tie in business KPIs like sales pipeline value, cases handled, or other output metrics relative to Salesforce spend. For example, tracking cost per active user or cost per sales opportunity can highlight efficiency. If cost per user is climbing while activity is flat, that’s a flag to investigate. A visual dashboard makes it easy to spot when costs are growing faster than benefits. It also reinforces a culture of cost awareness. Executives should regularly see the state of Salesforce usage and spend, just like any important business metric. By catching issues early – such as an unused batch of licenses or an integration that’s racking up costs – you can take corrective action before it becomes a budget crisis.
Regular cost reviews act as a financial health check. They ensure that as your Salesforce deployment evolves, you continuously prune waste, negotiate better deals, and optimize resources. In short, discipline through periodic reviews keeps Salesforce TCO under control and aligned with your organization’s needs.
Improving Salesforce ROI — Aligning Costs with Value
Controlling costs is only half the equation – the other half is ensuring that every dollar you spend on Salesforce delivers tangible value and ROI. For CIOs and IT leaders, the goal isn’t just to minimize cost, but to maximize the return on the Salesforce investment.
Here are strategies to align costs with business value:
- Link Spend to Business Outcomes: Don’t measure success by Salesforce usage stats alone (like number of logins or records) – measure it by outcomes. For each major cost component in your Salesforce ecosystem, identify a corresponding business metric. For instance, if you’re investing heavily in Sales Cloud licenses and features, track sales KPIs such as lead conversion rates, pipeline growth, or improvements in sales cycle time. If you’ve deployed Service Cloud, monitor customer support metrics, such as case resolution time, CSAT/NPS scores, or call deflection to self-service. The idea is to connect the dollars spent to the results achieved. When you see a positive correlation – e.g., an uptick in sales revenue after a new Salesforce feature – you know that spend is yielding ROI. If a cost area isn’t tied to a clear outcome, it may be an area to scrutinize or cut.
- Identify and Cut Low-ROI Items: Use data from your cost reviews and outcome metrics to pinpoint areas where Salesforce spends outweighs its value. Perhaps you’re paying for a Marketing Cloud module that your team barely uses, or you have premium add-ons that initially sounded good but haven’t justified themselves with results. These are candidates for reduction. It might mean reducing the number of licenses for a module or eliminating a feature if the business can live without it. Another example: if you’re paying for 24/7 Premier Support but your CRM is not mission-critical outside of business hours, perhaps a lower-tier support plan could suffice at a lower cost. Culling low-ROI costs frees up budget that can be reallocated to higher-impact areas (or returned to the bottom line).
- Double Down on High-Value Features: Conversely, when you discover that certain Salesforce features or modules are driving strong business value, consider reinforcing those. For example, if your analytics dashboards are leading to better decision-making and revenue gains, ensure that those tools are well-supported and widely adopted (perhaps even invest in additional user training). Or if an AppExchange app is saving hundreds of hours of manual work, ensure its license count is sufficient for all who need it, and invest in optimizing its use. By investing more in what works, you can amplify the ROI. This might seem counterintuitive in a cost-cutting discussion, but sometimes spending a bit more (or simply reallocating budget) on a high-ROI area yields exponential returns.
- Measure ROI Continuously: Treat Salesforce like any other business investment that requires ongoing justification. Establish a practice of conducting Salesforce ROI analysis annually. Calculate rough ROI figures: for example, estimate the value of efficiency gains or additional sales attributable to Salesforce, and divide by the total cost. While exact figures can be hard to pin down, the exercise forces a value-centric mindset. If the ROI is below expectations, dig into why – perhaps certain capabilities aren’t being utilized fully or processes need re-engineering to achieve the desired benefit. If ROI is strong, use that data to communicate wins to stakeholders and secure support for further innovation. The key is to not let Salesforce operate as a black box of spend – shine a light on what you’re getting for the money. By aligning every cost with a value driver, you ensure that your Salesforce environment is not only cost-controlled but also value-optimized.
In summary, improving Salesforce ROI is about being selective and strategic: trim the fat where value is low, and bolster the muscle where value is high. This alignment of cost to value will ensure Salesforce remains a worthwhile investment that drives business outcomes, not just an expensive IT tool.
Build vs Buy — Smarter Decisions for Cost Control
One strategic lever for managing Salesforce TCO is determining when to build custom solutions on the platform versus purchasing additional Salesforce products or third-party apps. Both approaches have cost implications, and making the right choice can save money and avoid vendor lock-in down the road.
Here’s how to approach the build vs buy decision for Salesforce features:
- When Buying Add-Ons Makes Sense: Salesforce and its ecosystem offer pre-built solutions for many needs – from CPQ (Configure-Price-Quote) tools to industry-specific data models to pre-made integrations. Buying an add-on (whether an official Salesforce module or an AppExchange product) often makes sense if the feature is complex to build and not core to your business’s unique advantage. The benefits of buying include speed (immediate functionality) and vendor-provided support/maintenance. For example, if you need an e-signature capability, purchasing a well-known app might be faster and more reliable than building one from scratch. Buying is also convenient if you lack in-house developer capacity or if the cost is low enough that it doesn’t break the bank. However, convenience can be costly in the long term if subscriptions accumulate.
- When Building Pays Off: Building a custom solution on the Salesforce platform can be cost-effective in the long run, particularly when compared to a pricey subscription. The calculation to be made is a financial trade-off: upfront development and maintenance costs versus ongoing subscription fees. If an add-on costs, say, $50 per user per month, and you have 200 users, that’s $ 10,000 per year. Could you invest a one-time $200,000 to build a custom solution to address the same need, and then allocate approximately $ 20,000 per year to maintain it? If yes, the 3-year cost of building ($260k) might significantly undercut the 3-year cost of buying (~$360k). Over a multi-year horizon, building can yield savings. Building also gives you full control to tailor the solution exactly to your needs and avoid features you won’t use (you’re not paying for unwanted bells and whistles). It can reduce vendor lock-in, since you’re not tied to a third-party’s pricing or release cycle – though you are still on the Salesforce platform.
- Consider Complexity and Core Competency: The decision isn’t purely financial. Consider the complexity of building and whether your team has the skills to support it. A custom-built app that is poorly constructed could incur huge maintenance costs, erasing any savings. Also consider if the functionality is a core business differentiator. If that’s the case, you might want full control (favoring the build). If it’s a commodity capability (such as an email integration), buying might be a safer option. A middle ground some take is to start with a purchased solution to get up and running, while evaluating a potential build in the long term if costs escalate.
- Beware of Vendor Lock-In and Contract Creep: When buying, be mindful of how easy (or hard) it is to exit that solution. AppExchange vendors might lure you in with low introductory rates or free trials, only to raise prices later. Alternatively, you may accumulate a lot of data or processes tied to that app, making it difficult to switch later (classic vendor lock-in). If you build in-house, you avoid third-party lock-in, but you do “lock in” to your own platform (Salesforce) more deeply with custom code. Ensure that whichever route you’re comfortable with, you’re committed to. If you leave Salesforce entirely down the road, custom-built features will have to be rebuilt on a new platform – similarly, purchased Salesforce add-ons would also be a sunk cost. The key is to evaluate total lifecycle cost and flexibility: sometimes a higher upfront cost (build) yields flexibility and lower TCO over time, whereas a quick buy might have lower immediate cost but higher cumulative cost and less flexibility. Always run the numbers for 3-5 years out, not just the immediate project, when making build vs buy decisions.
- Decision Framework: Develop a simple internal framework for build vs buy. For example: Threshold 1: if the subscription cost of an add-on over 2-3 years exceeds the estimated build cost, strongly consider building. Threshold 2: If the functionality is highly specific to your business (and could give a competitive advantage), lean towards building so you can optimize it fully. Threshold 3: if time-to-market is critical or the area is not a long-term strategic focus, lean towards buying for speed. By systematically evaluating each potential add-on against these criteria, you’ll make smarter decisions that keep Salesforce costs under control and aligned with strategy.
In short, don’t automatically click “buy” on every new Salesforce feature. A smarter mix of build vs buy can significantly reduce your TCO while still giving your users the capabilities they need.
Salesforce TCO Checklist
Use this checklist as a quick reference to ensure you’re managing Salesforce’s total cost of ownership proactively:
☐ Map all direct and indirect costs – List out every expense: licenses, implementation fees, integrations, support contracts, admin team salaries, training programs, AppExchange app fees, storage/add-on purchases. Visibility is the first step to control.
☐ Track AppExchange and customization spend – Keep an inventory of all third-party apps (and their subscription costs) and major custom development initiatives (with ongoing maintenance efforts). This prevents “stealth” costs from going unnoticed.
☐ Run quarterly cost-and-usage audits – Set a regular cadence (quarterly or at least annually) to review license usage, app utilization, and any cost changes. Adjust your license counts and app subscriptions based on these findings to eliminate waste.
☐ Measure ROI by business outcome, not just adoption – Evaluate Salesforce success by the results it drives (sales revenue, service efficiency, etc.), compared to its cost. Ensure each major cost item can be justified by a business metric improvement.
☐ Decide build vs buy based on lifecycle cost, not convenience – For new needs, analyze the 3-5 year cost of subscribing to an add-on versus building in-house. Consider your team’s capacity and the strategic importance, and choose the option that offers lower TCO and acceptable risk, rather than the quickest fix.
By regularly checking these boxes, you’ll foster a culture of cost awareness and value focus around Salesforce, keeping its TCO well-managed.
Example Scenario — Avoiding TCO Blind Spots
Case Example: A mid-market manufacturer learns the hard way about hidden Salesforce costs. Acme Manufacturing implemented Salesforce Enterprise Edition for its sales and support teams, with 300 user licenses.
For the first year, everything seemed on budget – they had accounted for the $X in license fees and $Y in partner implementation fees. But by the middle of year two, the CIO was puzzled by mounting CRM-related expenses.
Upon a thorough review, Acme discovered several TCO blind spots:
- Unused Licenses: After an aggressive initial rollout, they had over-provisioned user licenses. Departments anticipated hiring that didn’t happen, leaving about 50 licenses sitting idle. These were paid for in a multi-year contract – essentially money wasted on shelfware.
- AppExchange App Sprawl: Different teams had installed a total of 12 AppExchange apps, ranging from document generation to workflow add-ons. There was no centralized tracking of these. Finance discovered they were spending over $100,000 annually on third-party app subscriptions alone. In fact, two departments were paying for similar project management tools, not realizing they overlapped in functionality.
- Data Storage Overages: By month 18, Salesforce storage limits were breached. Years of customer orders and attachments were accumulating. The company automatically purchased extra data storage, which ended up costing over $ 3,000 per month beyond the budgeted amount. No one had planned for a data archiving strategy, so the bills continued to rise as data volumes increased.
- Maintenance and Support Costs: Minor enhancements and fixes were popping up constantly – a new sales process tweak here, an integration update there. Lacking internal capacity, Acme was hiring an external Salesforce consultant on an ad-hoc basis to do these tweaks at premium hourly rates. Over the course of a year, they quietly spent nearly $80,000 on these unplanned maintenance tasks. Additionally, users were complaining about slow reports, so they were considering a costly optimization project.
Realizing the situation, Acme’s leadership took action to regain control of Salesforce TCO:
- They conducted a comprehensive cost audit and instituted quarterly reviews in the future. Immediately, they identified the unused 50 licenses and negotiated with Salesforce to apply them to other needed areas, thereby reducing the count at the next renewal and avoiding approximately $ 90,000 in renewal fees.
- They formed a governance committee to oversee AppExchange apps. The committee evaluated each app’s usage and ROI. As a result, they eliminated five out of the 12 apps (consolidating duplicate functionality and dropping low-use ones), saving an estimated $ 50,000 per year. The remaining apps were put under central management to monitor usage and prevent redundant purchases.
- The IT team implemented a data management policy, bulk-archiving old records and large email attachments off-platform to cheaper storage, thereby bringing Salesforce data usage back under the free limit. This immediately reduced the $ 3,000/month storage surcharge to nearly $0. In the future, they established an automated process to export and delete obsolete data quarterly.
- To address ongoing changes, Acme shifted from ad-hoc support to a fixed managed services agreement with a Salesforce partner. For a flat monthly fee, they got a certain number of admin hours for small changes and support, which turned out more cost-effective and predictable than surprise bills. They also invested in training an internal “super user” to handle minor administrative tasks, thereby reducing their reliance on external consultants.
After 12 months of implementing these corrective measures, Acme Manufacturing successfully reduced its Salesforce TCO by approximately 15% annually. Equally important, the CIO and CFO now have full visibility into where the Salesforce budget is going.
The sales and support teams continue to utilize Salesforce to drive revenue and enhance customer satisfaction, now with a leaner cost structure.
This scenario illustrates how a proactive approach can uncover hidden costs and significantly improve cost efficiency – without sacrificing any business value from Salesforce.
FAQ — Managing Salesforce TCO
How do enterprises calculate Salesforce’s full TCO?
Enterprises calculate Salesforce’s full TCO by aggregating all costs associated with the platform over its lifespan. This means not just the license fees, but also implementation costs, integration expenses, any middleware or tools, support contracts, internal staff salaries devoted to Salesforce (including administrators and developers), training programs, third-party app subscriptions, and even indirect costs such as data storage overages or downtime. A useful approach is to categorize costs (such as subscription, development, and support) and project them over a multi-year period (3-5 years) to capture the total cost of ownership. By conducting this comprehensive accounting, companies can see the “all-in” cost of Salesforce and plan budgets accurately.
What hidden costs surprise CIOs the most?
CIOs are often most surprised by costs that didn’t appear in the original proposal or the first-year budget. Common ones include integration maintenance (the ongoing work to keep Salesforce talking to other systems as things change), data/storage fees (many don’t anticipate how quickly CRM data grows and how pricey extra storage can be), and AppExchange app fees (teams quietly adding apps that accumulate significant subscription costs). Another is the cost of unused licenses – many CIOs discover they’re paying for users who never log in. Finally, premium support or consulting costs can be a significant shock; basic support is included in Salesforce, but enterprises often end up paying for Premier Support or incurring numerous consulting hours to resolve issues, which can add 20% or more to costs. All these can catch IT leaders off guard if they’re not monitoring continuously.
How often should cost reviews be done?
At a minimum, an enterprise should conduct a Salesforce cost review annually, aligned with the contract renewal cycle, to make adjustments before committing to another year. However, best practice is to do quarterly or biannual reviews. A quarterly check-in can be lighter-weight – just verifying license usage and any new costs – and an in-depth review can be conducted annually to reset your strategy. The key is regularity: by reviewing on a schedule, you can spot trends (such as the rising usage of an app that will spike costs) and take action early. It also ensures accountability, making teams aware that they will need to justify their Salesforce spend and usage every few months. This cadence prevents the “set and forget” trap that leads to cost creep.
How do we decide between building and buying Salesforce functionality?
Deciding whether to build or buy comes down to a cost-benefit analysis and a strategic fit. Evaluate the total cost of ownership over a few years for each option. Buying a Salesforce add-on or AppExchange product offers the advantages of quick deployment and vendor support; however, it comes with continuous subscription fees and potential lock-in. Building a custom solution may require a higher upfront investment (in development effort) and ongoing maintenance work, but if you have the necessary talent and the feature will be used long-term, it can be cheaper overall and tailored precisely to your needs. Consider factors such as: Is the feature highly unique to our business (lean build to achieve a custom fit), or is it standard across many companies (lean buy, no need to reinvent the wheel)? Do we have in-house expertise to build and maintain it? How do the costs compare if we project 3-5 years out? Often, if the subscription cost for buying will exceed the build cost in just a couple of years, building in-house may be the smarter cost control move. On the other hand, if speed is critical or you’re not confident in maintaining custom code, buying is the safer bet. It’s a case-by-case decision, but always make it using a clear framework, considering lifecycle cost, time-to-value, and strategic importance.
What KPIs help track Salesforce ROI effectively?
To track Salesforce ROI, link your usage to business outcomes using a set of key performance indicators (KPIs). Some effective KPIs include: User adoption rate (e.g. percentage of users logging in weekly, or the ratio of active users to paid licenses – this shows if you’re getting use out of what you pay for), Data quality or process KPIs (like lead conversion rate, sales cycle length, case resolution time – improvements in these over time can often be attributed to effective Salesforce use), Cost per outcome (e.g. Salesforce cost per $1 of revenue generated, or cost per customer onboarded – useful for quantifying efficiency), and Feature adoption metrics (such as how many automated processes run vs manual tasks, or usage of key new features like a CPQ tool). You can also look at productivity metrics (like number of sales calls or service cases handled per user pre- and post-Salesforce). The goal is to connect the investment to tangible results: if you can show, for instance, that after implementing Salesforce, sales grew 20% while costs grew 5%, that’s a strong ROI indicator. Monitoring these KPIs over time helps ensure that increasing Salesforce costs are justified by commensurate business value.
Read more about our Salesforce Contract Negotiation Service.
