Mastering Salesforce Contract Legal Terms: MSA, Order Forms, and Key Clauses

Mastering Salesforce Contract Legal Terms

Salesforce contracts are foundational to an enterprise’s long-term costs and flexibility in using the platform. When you enter a Salesforce relationship, you’re signing up for more than just a technology solution – you’re also agreeing to a complex set of legal terms that will govern your rights and obligations for years.

The Master Subscription Agreement (MSA) and the Order Forms define how you pay for the service, how you can use it, and what happens if things go wrong.

These documents often contain vendor-favored language, similar to how a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement negotiation tends to favor Microsoft’s interests.

In 2025, with growing scrutiny on data use and new AI features, it’s more critical than ever to approach a Salesforce MSA negotiation with a strategic mindset.

Procurement leaders and CIOs must be as diligent with Salesforce as they are with other major vendors – for example, using a Microsoft EA renewal checklist approach to ensure no detail is overlooked.

By proactively reviewing and negotiating terms, you can avoid unpleasant surprises, mitigate risks, and even reduce costs over the life of the contract (much like reducing Microsoft costs through careful license optimization and compliance).

In short, don’t assume Salesforce’s contract is non-negotiable. Approach it with healthy skepticism, a clear strategy, and an eye for clauses that could impact your company’s wallet or data security.

Introduction to Salesforce’s Contracts

When you engage with Salesforce, you’ll encounter two primary documents: the Master Subscription Agreement (MSA) and one or more Order Forms.

The Salesforce MSA is the overarching legal framework – think of it as the rulebook that applies to all your Salesforce dealings. It’s analogous to the main Enterprise Agreement terms you might see in other large vendor contracts.

The MSA encompasses broad provisions, including liabilities, usage rights, data protection commitments, warranties, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

In essence, the MSA sets the baseline rules and contract clauses that govern your entire relationship with Salesforce.

The Order Form, on the other hand, is the transactional document for each purchase. It ties directly into the MSA (often stating that the purchase is subject to the MSA terms). An Order Form specifies what products or cloud services you’re buying, in what quantity (e.g., number of user licenses or amount of storage), for how long, and at what price.

Salesforce order form terms typically include the subscription period (start and end dates), the products/editions, the unit prices, and any applied discounts, as well as payment terms (e.g., annual payment vs. upfront payment), and sometimes special conditions or notes. Each Order Form you sign is a binding commitment for that set of services under the MSA umbrella.

Together, the MSA + Order Forms form the entire agreement – the MSA provides the legal skeleton and each Order Form fleshes out the business deal. It’s important to read them together: fine print in the MSA can heavily impact what you agree to in an Order Form.

For example, the MSA might say that all orders are non-cancelable and fees are non-refundable, which means once you sign an Order Form for 100 licenses for 3 years, you’re paying that full amount even if you use far fewer licenses or want to exit early.

In summary, the MSA is the master contract (often not customer-friendly by default), and Order Forms are how you execute purchases against that contract. Understanding both is critical because these documents govern your entire Salesforce relationship, from costs to compliance to termination conditions.

Order Form Essentials

What’s in a Salesforce Order Form? The Order Form is where the rubber meets the road for costs.

It will list each product or cloud service you’re subscribing to – Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Marketing Cloud, or any add-on (perhaps even new AI services Salesforce introduces).

For each line item, it specifies the quantity (for example, 500 Enterprise Edition user licenses), the price per unit (which might reflect a discount off list price), and the total subscription fee. It also clearly states the subscription term (e.g., 36 months from Jan 1, 2025, to Dec 31, 2027). You’ll find any discounts or promotions applied (often as a percentage off list, or a “total contract value” summary showing savings).

Payment terms are usually indicated – Salesforce typically invoices annually in advance.

Still, your Order Form might note if you negotiated something different (like quarterly payments to align with your cash flow).

In some cases, the Order Form includes other details like the specific Salesforce org or instance, or an attached Data Processing Addendum if you’re signing it together.

Essentially, the Order Form is your commercial terms on paper: what you’re buying, for how long, and under what financial conditions.

Key negotiation points on Order Forms:

Unlike the standard MSA (which Salesforce often claims is “standard”), Order Forms can be more flexible and are definitely negotiable.

Here are essential items to focus on:

• Co-terming and aligned end dates: If you’re making multiple purchases over time, try to co-term new purchases so they all end on the same date. For example, if you add 100 more licenses six months into a 3-year term, you can request a shorter initial proration so that those licenses renew at the same time as your original batch. Aligning end dates for all subscriptions simplifies renewal management and provides a unified opportunity for negotiation. Vendors prefer scattered, staggered end dates because it reduces your leverage (you’re always mid-term on something). By co-terming, you consolidate your power at the time of renewal.
• Avoid evergreen auto-renewals without review: Salesforce Order Forms, unless modified, will auto-renew by default (often year-to-year after the initial term) unless you give notice to cancel. Negotiate this if possible – for instance, you might strike the auto-renew clause or at least extend the notice period to say 60 or 90 days so you have ample time to decide. The goal is to avoid a scenario where an Order Form quietly renews for a year and you’re obligated to pay simply because notice wasn’t given in time. At a minimum, set calendar reminders well in advance of any renewal notice deadline. If possible, push to require a mutual agreement to renew rather than an automatic renewal. Never just “set and forget” a Salesforce contract; proactive review is needed to prevent unintended extensions.
• Volume and multi-year discounts: Just like with a volume licensing strategy for Microsoft or other vendors, you should aim to secure the best discounts based on your volume and commitment length. Salesforce sales teams often give better pricing for larger user counts or multi-year deals. If you’re committing to a big spend or a multi-year term, negotiate those Salesforce order form terms to lock in discounts upfront and even at renewal. For instance, you could negotiate that the prices on the Order Form are fixed for a three-year term (protecting you from annual price hikes) or that any additional licenses you add during the term will be at the same per-unit price (so they can’t charge higher rates mid-stream). If your company is also dealing with a Microsoft EA renewal checklist internally, consider the parallels: both Salesforce and Microsoft deals reward bundling and longer terms with initial discounts, but you need to ensure you actually realize those savings long-term without hidden costs later.
• Bundle and align with other negotiations: Sometimes, big enterprises bundle their negotiations or align timelines for leverage. For example, if your Microsoft Enterprise Agreement is up for renewal around the same time as your Salesforce contract, you might subtly let each vendor know that you have budget decisions to make between them. While Salesforce and Microsoft are different products, your budget is finite – Salesforce may offer better terms if they know Microsoft (with its Enterprise Agreement terms) is competing for the same dollars (and vice versa). In some cases, companies have even achieved incentives by timing deals in the same quarter, though Salesforce won’t formally “bundle” with a Microsoft deal, you can internally use one to leverage the other. The idea is to lock in multi-year discounts if bundled commitments are being made: if you’re promising to spend X over 3 years, ensure you’re getting a corresponding break in price. Don’t be afraid to mention that you’re also looking at how to reduce Microsoft costs or optimize other vendors – it signals that you expect competitive pricing from all sides.
• Beware of the no-reduction commitment: A critical piece hidden in most Salesforce Order Forms (via the MSA language) is that quantities purchased cannot be decreased during the term. This means once you sign up for, say, 1000 licenses for 3 years, you are locked into paying for those 1000 licenses every year, even if your actual usage or headcount drops. There’s no concept of a partial cancellation or scaling down mid-term in the standard contract. This is analogous to being stuck with a certain volume in a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement negotiation – you can add (true-up) but not reduce until renewal. Knowing this, plan your license count carefully. It may be better to slightly under-commit and then add more later (you can always purchase additional licenses if needed, usually at the same discounted rate if negotiated, in a pro-rated fashion). Negotiate flexibility if you can, such as the right to drop a small percentage of licenses at renewal or a shorter term, so you can adjust sooner. Salesforce usually resists decreases, but large customers occasionally win concessions, such as a one-time downward adjustment option at renewal. The key is: don’t overbuy due to over-optimistic plans. Align your Order Form terms with realistic adoption to avoid paying for shelfware. This is part of license optimization – ensuring you’re only paying for what you actually use, a principle that applies to Salesforce just as much as it does to optimizing a volume true-up costs in other enterprise software deals.

In summary, the Order Form is where you define the business deal. Negotiate it hard: get your co-terms, secure discounts, cap future increases, and avoid being trapped by auto-renewal or over-commitment.

If structured properly, your Order Form will set you up with predictable costs and flexibility; if not, it can become an expensive, rigid obligation.

Key MSA Clauses to Watch

The Master Subscription Agreement contains a lot of fine print, and certain clauses in particular have a big impact on risk and cost.

Here are the key Salesforce contract clauses to scrutinize and potentially negotiate:

• Liability Caps: This clause limits the financial responsibility of Salesforce in the event of errors or malfunctions. Salesforce’s standard MSA typically caps its liability at a relatively low amount (often the fees you paid in the last 12 months) and excludes “consequential damages” (meaning they won’t pay for indirect losses like lost profits, lost data, or business interruption). In practice, this means if Salesforce’s service fails and causes a huge loss for your business, they’re still only on the hook for a refund of what you paid, at most. It effectively makes your own company carry the risk for anything beyond a small service credit. During Salesforce MSA negotiation, you should try to raise this liability cap or at least carve out exceptions. For example, you might negotiate that for certain critical events (like Salesforce’s gross negligence or a data breach caused by Salesforce), the liability cap is higher or unlimited. Even if Salesforce won’t give unlimited liability across the board (they rarely do), aiming for a cap equal to, say, 24 months of fees, or a set dollar amount, can provide better protection. Also, ensure that some damages aren’t excluded; for instance, if you face regulatory fines due to Salesforce’s failure, those shouldn’t be simply labeled “consequential” and tossed out. Pushing back on liability terms is about making sure Salesforce has some skin in the game if their service truly fails you.
• Indemnification: Indemnities deal with who covers legal damages if a third party sues. Salesforce’s standard indemnification is one-sided in their favor: they will indemnify you as the customer only for intellectual property infringement claims (i.e., if a third party claims Salesforce’s software infringes their patent or copyright, Salesforce will handle the defense or settlement). This is important, but it’s a narrow scenario. Meanwhile, you are expected to indemnify Salesforce for a much broader range of issues, typically anything arising from your use of the service – for example, if you upload data you shouldn’t, and someone sues Salesforce, or if your users violate a law using the platform, you cover Salesforce’s costs. This one-sided indemnity is common in vendor MSAs, but you should examine it closely. Push for mutual indemnification where possible, or at least balance it: ensure Salesforce indemnifies not just for IP, but perhaps for data privacy breaches or other significant issues that they control. Also, narrow your own indemnity obligations so you’re not taking responsibility for things beyond your reasonable control. Suppose Salesforce refuses to budge on adding mutual clauses. In that case, you might at least clarify the process: e.g., both parties must promptly notify the other of any claims and let the indemnifying party control the defense. The goal is to avoid the trap of accepting Salesforce’s standard language blindly – it can leave your company holding a lot of potential liability. Focus on the biggest risks to your business and try to get Salesforce to share or carry indemnity for those (data security is a great example to bring up in negotiations, since a breach in their system could trigger third-party claims against you). This clause is a centerpiece of risk allocation – treat it as a must-discuss item.
• Warranty Disclaimers: Salesforce’s MSA will generally disclaim most warranties, essentially saying the service is provided “as is” except as expressly stated. In plain language, this means Salesforce isn’t promising the software will meet all your requirements, be error-free, or guarantee any specific results. The only warranties might be minimal (e.g., that they have the right to provide the service, or that it will function substantially as described in the documentation). They also often state that they are not liable for data loss or that they don’t guarantee the service will be uninterrupted. These disclaimers are standard, but be aware of them – they reinforce the liability limits. Suppose certain assurances are vital to you (for instance, uptime commitments or compliance with certain standards). In that case, you may need to negotiate an SLA or addendum to include those, because the core MSA won’t. Also watch for any hidden warranty gotchas – e.g., if they warrant something “to the extent commercially reasonable,” that’s very weak. While you likely can’t eliminate all the disclaimer language, you should know that what isn’t explicitly promised is not covered. Don’t assume Salesforce will do something unless it’s actually written in the contract or an attached policy.
• Termination Rights: The MSA defines under what conditions either party can terminate the agreement. Termination for cause (like a material breach that isn’t cured) is usually allowed for both sides. Still, termination for convenience (you deciding to end early without cause) is not permitted for customers under standard terms. In other words, once you sign up for a term (e.g. a 3-year order), you can’t just walk away mid-term – if you do, you are still financially on the hook for the full term’s fees (an early termination penalty essentially equal to all remaining fees). This is why negotiating shorter terms or opt-outs is important if you foresee possible changes. Check also what rights Salesforce has – they can typically terminate for your breach, or sometimes if you violate usage limits or laws. Ensure there’s a cure period (usually 30 days to fix a breach). Auto-renewal falls under this category, too: as mentioned earlier, most subscriptions auto-renew for one-year increments by default. Negotiate that if possible, or at least manage it closely. Lastly, consider adding termination assistance or rights, such as the option to retrieve your data within a specified window (typically 30-60 days after termination or expiration). And if you do terminate for Salesforce’s breach, you should not owe the remaining fees (and ideally get a refund for prepaid unused services). Clarify any ambiguities here, because how you exit the contract matters – whether at its natural end or early due to issues.
• Remedies and Exclusive Remedies: Be aware of any clauses that specify your sole remedy for certain issues. For instance, Salesforce might include that your exclusive remedy for downtime is a service credit (via their SLA policy). Or, if they breach a warranty, your sole remedy may be to terminate and receive a prorated refund. These “exclusive remedy” clauses limit your ability to pursue other solutions (like suing for damages) beyond what’s spelled out. It’s vendor-protective. While you might not get rid of all such clauses, knowing they exist is key. If, for example, service availability is crucial, negotiate the SLA credits to be meaningful or get an out if uptime drops below a threshold consistently. Don’t accept a token credit as the only compensation if an outage could seriously hurt your business. Similarly, if the contract says no matter what, your remedy is to cancel without a refund, that’s not really a remedy in a practical sense. Try to inject more balance: for critical failures, maybe you get out, and also some damages or assistance. This ties back to liability – a very strict exclusive remedy clause essentially reinforces that Salesforce never pays beyond a small cap.

In summary, key clauses to watch in the MSA include those that address risk and escape hatches, such as liability caps, indemnities, disclaimers, termination provisions, and remedies.

These clauses are often written in Salesforce’s favor (just as Microsoft contract negotiation experts know Microsoft’s agreements favor Microsoft). Your job is to spot where the biggest exposures are and negotiate improvements.

Even if you don’t get everything you ask for, raising these issues can lead Salesforce to make some concessions or clarify terms. Never assume “oh, that’s all boilerplate.” That boilerplate can determine whether you’re protected or on your own if something goes wrong.

Data Protection Addendum (DPA)

In today’s world, data privacy and protection terms are among the most important parts of any enterprise software contract. Salesforce, being a cloud provider, offers a Data Protection Addendum (DPA) (sometimes called a Data Processing Addendum) to address regulations like GDPR and other privacy laws. It’s vital to ensure this DPA is part of your agreement, especially if you operate in jurisdictions with strong data laws or in a regulated industry.

What to look for in Salesforce’s DPA:

The DPA should clearly affirm that you (the customer) own your data, and Salesforce is just processing it on your behalf.

It will usually commit Salesforce to certain privacy and security measures: compliance with GDPR for EU personal data, adherence to standard contractual clauses or other transfer mechanisms if data is moved internationally, and obligations to assist you with things like data subject requests (e.g., deleting or exporting data when an individual asks, if applicable).

Key points to confirm include:

• Data export rights: You should have the right and ability to export all your data from Salesforce, both during the contract and for a period after termination. This ensures you’re not locked in – if you leave Salesforce, you can take your data with you. The contract should specify how long you have to retrieve data after the contract ends (commonly 30-60 days). It’s good to test or document the method of export (Salesforce has tools and APIs to get your data).
• Data deletion and retention: Salesforce’s terms should guarantee that upon your request or contract end, they will delete your data from their systems (except any legal archival copies) after a certain time. If your policies or laws require data to be destroyed, make sure the contract aligns with that. For example, if you need all customer data wiped within 90 days of termination, get that in writing. Likewise, ensure Salesforce won’t delete your active data without notice. For example, if you accidentally lapse on a payment, the contract should ideally provide a grace period before data deletion (to avoid horror stories of data being wiped immediately upon suspension).
• Breach notification: The DPA or security addendum should require Salesforce to inform you promptly in the event of a data breach or security incident that affects your data. GDPR mandates “without undue delay” notification for breaches involving personal data. Even if not legally required for all data, negotiate a specific timeframe – for instance, Salesforce must notify you within 24 or 48 hours of confirming a breach. This is crucial for you to fulfill your own compliance obligations (you may need to notify regulators or customers within a specific timeframe). A vague promise of “we’ll let you know” isn’t enough; make it concrete.
• GDPR and global privacy compliance: Salesforce’s standard DPA covers the basics (they’ll be a Data Processor to your Data Controller in GDPR terms, etc.). If you have users or customers in other regions (California’s CCPA/CPRA, Brazil’s LGPD, etc.), ensure the DPA references compliance with those or add your own language. The DPA should include commitments such as: Salesforce will only process data as per your instructions, will impose confidentiality and proper safeguards on any sub-processors, and will assist you in fulfilling obligations (such as assisting with audits or data subject rights as needed). If you have specific needs (say, a financial institution needing adherence to specific banking data rules, or a healthcare entity requiring a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement), be sure to include those attachments. Salesforce does offer a HIPAA BAA for customers in healthcare – you’d need to sign that to cover Protected Health Information.
• Data residency and Hyperforce: A big consideration in 2025 is where your data is stored. Salesforce traditionally stored all data in a couple of global data centers, but with Hyperforce, they are offering more cloud deployment options in various regions (e.g., running Salesforce on AWS or other infrastructure in specific countries). If data residency is crucial (perhaps you have to keep EU data in Europe, or Australian data onshore, etc.), negotiate specific terms for that. For example, include language that your Salesforce instance will be hosted in [Germany/EU/Australia/etc] and will not be moved out without your consent. If Salesforce’s Hyperforce is needed to achieve this, ensure your contract or DPA explicitly says Salesforce will provision your environment in the required region. Understand that sometimes having a dedicated regional setup could be tied to certain editions or extra cost – but it might be non-negotiable for you due to law. Use this as leverage: Salesforce wants your business, so require them to meet your data residency needs as part of the deal. Data residency might also involve support personnel: if you need all support to be provided from certain countries (to avoid data leaving), state that. Essentially, tailor the DPA to your data governance policies – don’t just accept the stock version if you have stricter internal rules.
• Salesforce’s use of your data: Pay attention to any clause about how Salesforce may use customer data. Most cloud agreements permit the vendor to use your data for purposes of providing the service (obvious and necessary) and sometimes for “improving the service” or analytics on an aggregated level. Ensure the contract prohibits Salesforce from using your identifiable data for anything beyond providing services to you. In particular, with AI coming into play (which we’ll cover next), you might want to explicitly forbid using your data to train any AI models or for any marketing purposes. Salesforce’s agreements generally don’t allow it to misuse customer data, but it’s worth double-checking. Also, consider if you’ll allow Salesforce to anonymize and aggregate your usage data – many vendors do this to derive product insights. If you’re uncomfortable, negotiate an opt-out or stricter limits. The DPA is the right place to solidify that Salesforce must comply with your policies on data usage, privacy, and security. Get commitments that align with frameworks you need (ISO 27001, SOC reports availability, etc., often referenced in their Trust & Compliance documentation).

In summary, don’t overlook the DPA – it’s as important as the financial terms. With privacy regulations only increasing, make sure Salesforce’s legal terms have your back on data protection.

If something isn’t explicitly addressed (like a new law or a unique internal policy), bring it up during negotiation and add language to cover it. A strong DPA and data handling clause set will mitigate compliance risks and give you confidence to use Salesforce without stepping into legal pitfalls down the road.

Intellectual Property & New AI/ML Terms

Salesforce is a platform that often involves customizations – you might build custom objects, workflows, or even apps on top of it. Naturally, questions arise about who owns what intellectual property (IP) in this arrangement.

Additionally, as Salesforce rolls out new AI and machine learning features (such as Einstein AI and GPT-powered tools), there are emerging contract terms regarding how AI is used and who owns AI-generated content or insights. Let’s break down these aspects:

Ownership of customizations and data:

Generally, Salesforce’s MSA states that Salesforce owns the platform and all its pre-built IP, while you own your data and any customizations or configurations you create within your org. For example, if you design a custom data model or build a proprietary process in Salesforce, those specific customizations (and certainly all the data in the system) are your property. Salesforce doesn’t claim ownership of the work you do in the system.

However, they will likely have a license to use your configurations and data as needed to run the service (for instance, their system needs to process and possibly replicate your data for backups, etc., which you authorize). There’s also often a clause that if you provide Salesforce feedback or suggestions (like feature ideas), Salesforce can use those freely – that’s a standard “feedback license” so they’re not restricted from improving the product.

As a customer, just ensure nothing in the contract suggests Salesforce can use your actual business data or unique customizations beyond servicing your account. If you have especially sensitive configurations (maybe proprietary algorithms implemented in Salesforce), you could add a clause to clarify they won’t be shared or reused by Salesforce with others. Most of the time, this isn’t an issue, but it’s worth a look for peace of mind.

AI and machine learning usage of data:

From 2024 onward, a big topic in contracts is whether customer data can be used to train AI or machine learning models. We’ve seen other vendors (like Microsoft with its AI services and Copilot EA renewal discussions) clarify their terms on this due to customer concerns.

Salesforce has introduced various AI-driven features (for example, Einstein GPT, AI Cloud, etc.) that might involve analyzing customer data to provide insights or even generative outputs.

As of 2025, Salesforce has indicated that it does not use your Customer Data to train general AI models without permission, but you shouldn’t rely on corporate blog statements – you need it in the contract.

If you plan to use Salesforce’s AI features, review any supplemental terms or policies that come with them (Salesforce may have an AI Acceptable Use Policy or specific product terms).

Key points to negotiate or clarify:

• Salesforce should not use your personal or confidential data to improve or train AI models that would be used for other customers or for their general product development, unless you explicitly agree. If there is any clause allowing the use of “Usage Data” or “Aggregated data” for improving services, make sure it excludes the content of your records or any data that could identify your company or clients. You might allow them to use metrics (like how often features are used) in aggregate, but not your actual CRM records.
• If Salesforce is providing AI that does learn from your data (for your benefit, e.g., an AI model fine-tuned on your dataset), ensure it’s clear that the model (and any derived patterns from your data) cannot be used for others or taken by Salesforce if you leave. Essentially, if the AI feature builds on your proprietary data, you should have rights to the trained model or at least assurance that it’s only used for your account.
• AI-generated outputs: If, for instance, you use Salesforce’s AI to generate a sales email draft or a prediction, confirm that you own the output or at least have a full license to use it as you see fit. There’s an emerging question in software contracts: if an AI creates something using your data, do you own that creation? Ideally, the contract should say that any such outputs are deemed your data or your IP. Also consider confidentiality – AI might produce an output that contains snippets of your data (say a summary of a customer case). That output should be protected just like the source data.

New contract clauses in 2024+ for AI:

Salesforce and other vendors have been incorporating language related to AI usage. For example, an AI-driven licensing clause might explain what data Salesforce can collect to improve AI or disclaim responsibilities (they might say the AI suggestions are not guaranteed to be correct, etc.).

Be on the lookout for:

• Clauses requiring you to comply with an AI Acceptable Use Policy (meaning you shouldn’t use their AI to do illegal or unethical things – fairly standard).
• Disclaimers that the AI may produce inaccurate or biased results and that you are responsible for reviewing AI outputs. Essentially, they’ll protect themselves from liability for what the AI says or does.
• If there are any additional fees or licenses for AI features (for example, a certain number of AI credits or an add-on license for Einstein GPT), treat them as you would any product on an Order Form: negotiate pricing, try to pilot first if possible, and ensure you can opt out later if it doesn’t prove useful. Just as one must consider Copilot in a Microsoft EA renewal negotiation due to its cost and data implications, carefully consider Salesforce’s AI offerings in your contract strategy.

Negotiation strategies for AI/ML terms:

• Demand clarity and limits: Don’t accept vague statements like “Salesforce may use customer data to improve services.” Get specific wording that they cannot use your data to train broad AI models or, if they can use anonymized usage data, it should be clearly defined what that means. If Salesforce has an opt-out for data training, exercise it through the contract.
• Address ownership of models and data: If you are using, say, Salesforce’s machine learning to build a prediction model based on your data, you might request that you get a copy of that model or at least the right to have it deleted if you leave. This area is new, and not all vendors will agree, but raising it shows you’re thinking ahead about your IP.
• Protect confidential information: Ensure that any prompts or content you feed into an AI feature are covered by confidentiality just like any other data. If you’re having an AI agent analyze your data, Salesforce should treat that like any other processing – no less secure or private.
• Stay updated: This is a fast-moving space. What’s “standard” in 2024 or 2025 could change. Consider adding a clause that if Salesforce materially changes its AI/data usage policies in a way that conflicts with your expectations, you have the right to discuss and possibly terminate those features. For instance, if today they promise not to use your data for AI, but two years from now they change the policy, you don’t want to be automatically opted in.

In summary, treat new AI terms with the same rigor as any other key clause. As the saying goes, data is the new oil, and AI is the engine – don’t let Salesforce siphon your “oil” into their engine without explicit permission and benefit to you.

By negotiating limits on Salesforce’s rights to use your data and ensuring you retain ownership and control over what’s created from your data, you mitigate future disputes over intellectual property. This is an evolving area, so a bit of healthy paranoia and detailed contracting now can save headaches later.

Remember, what you agree to today sets a precedent – so if something doesn’t sit right (like an open-ended right for Salesforce to use “Customer Content” for machine learning), strike it or refine it now.

Gotcha Contract Clauses to Avoid

Beyond the headline clauses we’ve covered, there are a few sneaky provisions and pitfalls that often catch customers off guard. Consider these the “gotchas” in Salesforce contracts – not always obvious during the sales pitch, but lurking in the fine print.

Here are some to watch out for and avoid or negotiate:

• Audit Rights: Like many software vendors, Salesforce usually includes an audit clause allowing it to verify that you’re complying with the contract (e.g., you haven’t added users without paying, you’re not using the service beyond agreed limits, etc.). The clause might allow Salesforce or an auditor to inspect your usage. If left unchecked, this could mean an invasive audit at any time. To mitigate risk, negotiate the audit terms: for example, require reasonable advance notice (such as a 30-day notice before any audit), limit audits to at most once per year, and specify that audits should be conducted during normal business hours with minimal disruption. Also, include that Salesforce must comply with your security requirements when auditing (no removing data, signing an NDA, etc.). Critically, clarify who pays for the audit – usually, the vendor pays unless a significant violation is found (e.g., you’re under-paying by more than X%). You don’t want to foot a big audit bill. While compliance is important (you should strive to be in Microsoft licensing compliance and Salesforce compliance alike), you also don’t want open-ended fishing expeditions. Manage this clause so that you won’t face surprise compliance checks that could lead to surprise bills (or at least you have control over the process if it happens).
• Licensing Metric Changes: Salesforce defines how licenses are counted (per user, per device, etc., depending on product). One key consideration is whether the vendor reserves the right to modify how the metrics work or what’s included in a license. For instance, Salesforce could at some point redefine “user” or bundle certain functionality into a new license edition, potentially forcing you to upgrade. Protect against this by adding language that any changes to licensing metrics or product packaging during your term will not affect you until renewal and will not reduce the functionality you already purchased. Essentially, no bait-and-switch mid-term. If you bought X features, they shouldn’t remove some and say it’s now a new add-on you must pay for. Similarly, ensure that if Salesforce renames a product or replaces it with a new one, you get the new equivalent as part of your current entitlement. Another related point: if your contract is relying on a certain edition (say, Unlimited Edition), make sure they can’t force-migrate you to another edition at a higher cost mid-term. Clarity here prevents nasty surprises where you find out that “oh, we changed that feature to a separate SKU and you need to buy it now.” Insist on the stability of terms throughout the term of the agreement.
• Survival Clauses: Contracts often list which provisions survive termination. Common survivals are confidentiality, liability limitations (sometimes), indemnities for events that occurred, and any outstanding payment obligations. The “gotcha” isn’t that these exist (survivals are normal), but not knowing which things live on can hurt you. For example, suppose the indemnity you give to Salesforce survives termination. In that case, that means even years after you’ve left Salesforce, if a third-party sues Salesforce over something that happened while you were a customer, you might still get called to cover it. Be aware of this. You might negotiate that certain obligations survive only for a set time (e.g., confidentiality survives 3 years post-termination, not indefinitely). Also, ensure beneficial clauses survive as needed: if you have a right to get your data out, that should survive so they still have to assist post-termination. One particular point: the limitation of liability – some contracts explicitly state it survives, which protects Salesforce even after the contract ends (for issues that arose during the term). It’s hard to change that, but just know that ending the contract doesn’t erase liabilities that occurred while it was in effect. Read the survival clause list carefully and understand your lingering responsibilities (and rights) after the relationship ends. Many companies forget about this until a dispute pops up later.
• Price Increases Mid-Term: We discussed renewal uplifts separately, but another potential issue is any clause that allows Salesforce to adjust pricing during the term of an active Order Form. Typically, once you sign a multi-year Order Form, the pricing there is fixed for that term. However, make sure there isn’t language allowing, say, an increase due to changes in required third-party fees or other pass-through costs. Also, be cautious about any “floating” price terms. One scenario: some cloud agreements tie certain costs to usage that could grow (like storage overages, API call fees, etc.). Negotiate caps or fixed rate cards for thos,e so you’re not paying whatever they decide in year 2. Essentially, prevent unexpected hikes in the middle of your term. You want budget certainty. If you need additional licenses mid-term, negotiate upfront what they’ll cost (ideally the same discounted per-unit price as initial, or a defined percentage). Salesforce shouldn’t be able to say, “Oh, you want 100 more users? The list price went up 15%, so you pay more now.” Lock in prices for any foreseeable add-ons. If you lock a volume licensing strategy with set pricing tiers, stick to it. Another common clause: if you reduce your spend at renewal, some vendors reserve the right to back-bill discounts (this is more common with Microsoft true-up scenarios than Salesforce, but watch out for any weird language around repricing if volumes change). Clean, fixed pricing terms with no mid-term increases is the goal.
• Auto-Renewal Traps: We covered auto-renewal in Order Forms, but it’s worth re-emphasizing as a potential issue, as many customers forget the renewal date. Salesforce will often send a quote or reminder, but you cannot rely on that. The trap is missing the notice window – say your contract requires 30 days’ notice to cancel, and you notify 20 days out, you’re likely already on the hook for the next term. To avoid this, negotiate a longer notice (60+ days) and, if possible, an explicit clause that Salesforce will send an email alert X days before renewal (some vendors agree to this courtesy). Also, consider negotiating out automatic renewal entirely if your procurement policies don’t allow no-review renewals. The ideal is that the contract expires and you sign a new one or an amendment to continue – that forces a conversation. Vendor default is the opposite: they want it to renew without action so revenue continues. Don’t let inertia lock you in; stay in control of that timeline.

In summary, the fine print can hide things that cost you money or flexibility. Audit and compliance terms can lead to surprise bills if not managed; licensing changes can reduce value if not frozen; post-termination obligations can sneak up later; and pricing tricks can inflate costs.

The theme is to read carefully and think “what if” for each clause: What if Salesforce exercises this right? What if we need to get out? What if usage changes? By addressing these hypotheticals in the contract, you avoid the “gotchas” that others only discover when it’s too late. A bit of extra negotiation up front on these nuances can save a lot of pain (and money) down the road.

Negotiation Checklist for Salesforce Legal Terms

To help you prepare, here’s an executive-style checklist summarizing do’s and don’ts for key contract areas. Use this as a quick reference when reviewing Salesforce’s MSA and Order Forms, so you remember what to negotiate and why it matters:

Use this checklist as a guide during negotiations. Every “Do” item strengthens your position or reduces risk, and every “Don’t” is a common mistake that could cost you.

Salesforce might push back on some of these, but coming in with this checklist shows you’re a savvy customer who won’t fall for typical traps. It sets the tone for a more balanced agreement.

Five Best Practices for Salesforce MSA Negotiation

Negotiating a Salesforce contract is not just about reacting to what Salesforce offers – it’s about proactively steering the process. Below are five best practices to help you master the art of Salesforce MSA and Order Form negotiations.

These are high-level strategies that procurement leaders and CIOs at successful enterprises use to get better outcomes:

1. Start Early and Involve the Right Stakeholders: Don’t wait until the week before your Salesforce renewal or implementation deadline to review legal terms. Begin the review process months in advance. Engage your legal team, procurement, IT leadership, and any stakeholder who has skin in the game (security, compliance, etc.). Early involvement prevents rushing into a signature when sales pressure mounts. It also gives you time to educate internal stakeholders – for instance, explaining to a sales VP why you’re pushing back on a clause, so they don’t think you’re simply “being difficult.” Early and broad involvement enables you to form a united front in negotiations and cover all angles, from financial to legal to technical. This is similar to how one would approach a major Microsoft contract negotiation – with a cross-functional team, clear goals, and plenty of lead time to get it right.
2. Align Salesforce Terms with Your Broader IT and Renewal Strategy: Consider your Salesforce deal in the context of your overall IT vendor landscape. Do you have a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement or other major contracts co-terming around the same period? Develop a cohesive EA renewal strategy that includes Salesforce. For example, if you plan budget and procurement cycles for Microsoft, do the same for Salesforce so you can leverage one against the other. Savvy enterprises treat these big contracts collectively – the goal is to ensure smooth renewals and avoid fiscal surprises. If you secured certain concessions in a Microsoft EA (like price holds or flex-down rights), see if you can achieve analogous terms in your Salesforce deal. Consistency is key; it helps in internal planning and makes it clear to Salesforce that you won’t accept terms that are wildly worse than what you have elsewhere. Even if the subject matter differs, a lot of negotiation principles carry over (for instance, you might use lessons from a Software Assurance negotiation – such as how you insisted on value for support dollars – to inform how you approach Salesforce Premier Support or training credits). Aligning strategies also means timing discussions so you’re not overwhelmed. If possible, stagger the final negotiation periods to give each your full attention, or at least have separate teams tackling Microsoft vs. Salesforce, sharing notes on tactics.
3. Push Back on One-Sided Clauses – Don’t Buy the “Standard” Line: Salesforce reps might tell you that no one ever changes the MSA or that certain clauses “can’t be changed.” Take this with a grain of salt. Many large enterprises have successfully negotiated improvements to Salesforce’s terms. Identify your non-negotiables (e.g., maybe unlimited liability for data breach is a must, or a cap on renewal increase). Firmly push for those changes. If Salesforce initially refuses, that’s normal – continue the conversation. Provide logical reasons or even examples (“Our policy requires this” or “Other vendors have given us similar terms”). Remember, everything is negotiable if the deal size and circumstances warrant it. Use the leverage you have – perhaps it’s a big new expansion, or the fact you’re a referenceable brand – to argue for what you need. Also, sometimes you can trade something: for instance, you might agree to a slightly longer term or a higher upfront commitment in exchange for better legal terms. What you should not do is passively accept the contract as-is out of fear of rocking the boat. Being skeptical of vendor-centric language is healthy; Salesforce has lawyers protecting its interests, and you need to do the same for yours. If a clause seems too one-sided, it probably is – and you should say so. Worst case, Salesforce says no; best case, you get a concession that could prove very valuable later. At the very least, you may get an explanation or a
   middle-ground tweak. This practice is about mindset: treat the negotiation as a partnership discussion, but one where you will challenge unfair terms. Salesforce will respect you for it (even if it feels tense), because it shows you’re a sophisticated customer.
4. Make Salesforce Clarify AI and Data Usage Rights: In 2025, with AI being a hot topic, don’t overlook any terms related to data usage and artificial intelligence. Ask Salesforce directly how your data will be used, especially with any AI features. Get clarifications in writing and, if needed, insert them into the contract. For example, if you plan to use an AI feature that summarizes your sales calls, confirm whether those call transcripts might be stored or analyzed elsewhere. Demand transparency on model usage – if Salesforce’s AI uses any third-party LLM (Large Language Model) behind the scenes, ensure they are contractually responsible for how that third party treats your data. Additionally, press Salesforce on whether any of your data (even anonymized) will feed their AI training. You might say, “We need a clause that states our customer content will not be used to train or improve AI models outside of our own instance.” By forcing these discussions, you often educate the Salesforce team as well (they may not volunteer details unless asked). Given the rapid development of AI-driven licensing models, this presents both risks and opportunities. Salesforce might have new products that use your data for AI – scrutinize those just as you would if Microsoft proposed an AI tool analyzing your Office 365 data (remember how customers had to consider data exposure with Microsoft 365 Copilot?). The principle: clarity now or pain later. So include AI and data usage in your negotiation checklist. It’s not just a legal formality; it directly ties to your data governance and intellectual property concerns.
5. Use Competitive Alternatives and Leverage Wisely: One of the strongest negotiation tactics is the subtle (or not-so-subtle) reminder that you have other options. With Salesforce, if you’re a large enterprise, you might be deeply invested, but Salesforce knows it’s not the only game in town for CRM or cloud platforms. Without getting adversarial, you can hint at or explicitly mention that you are evaluating or have the capability to switch if needed. For instance, bring up Microsoft’s Dynamics 365 as a potential alternative in conversation or mention that your strategy is to review Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) offerings for various solutions to keep vendors competitive. If Salesforce believes there’s a chance you could take your business elsewhere, they tend to be more flexible on both price and terms. Also, leverage internal alternatives: maybe you have a significant investment in another sales or support system, or a custom-built solution – note that you have choices. Additionally, use the presence of new purchasing models in the market as leverage. For example, with Microsoft, some enterprises are moving to a Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA-E) or CSP model instead of an EA to gain flexibility. Similarly, you could explore if any Salesforce reseller arrangements or shorter-term SaaS alternatives exist, just to have something to mention. The leverage could also be timing – e.g., you’re not in a rush and can afford to delay a project if terms aren’t acceptable (end-of-quarter pressure on the sales team can be used here). Competitive leverage isn’t just about switching vendors; it’s about showing Salesforce that you’re informed and willing to do what it takes to get a fair deal. Whether it’s Oracle, SAP, or Microsoft, any big player hates to lose to another. Even the suggestion that your volume licensing strategy is to consolidate vendors or hold an RFP can make Salesforce work harder to please you. Just be sure to use this tactic credibly: empty bluffs can backfire, but genuine exploration of alternatives (or at least a well-supported stance that you’re not locked in) can significantly strengthen your negotiating hand.

By following these best practices, you set a strong foundation for a successful negotiation. In essence: be proactive, strategic, and unafraid to ask for what you need. Salesforce negotiators are trained to maximize their advantage – you must be equally prepared to protect your interests.

With early planning, alignment to overall strategies (including those you’ve learned from Microsoft EA discounts and enterprise agreements), a willingness to push back, focus on emerging areas like AI, and smart use of leverage, you can turn the Salesforce contract from a minefield into a balanced business partnership document.

This ultimately saves money, reduces risk, and ensures you can utilize Salesforce’s technology on your terms.

Related articles

• Salesforce Order Form Negotiation Guide: Aligning Deals and Avoiding Pitfalls
• Salesforce MSA Decoded: Top 10 Clauses Enterprises Must Negotiate
• Salesforce Data Processing Addendum (DPA) Guide: Ensuring Compliance and Negotiating Privacy Terms
• Salesforce Audit Rights & Compliance Clauses: Protecting Yourself in the Contract
• Salesforce AI & IP Terms Explained: Who Owns Your Data and AI Outputs

FAQs

Q: Can we negotiate Salesforce’s Master Subscription Agreement, or is it truly non-negotiable?
A: Yes, you can negotiate it. While Salesforce may initially present the MSA as a standard form, most large or strategic customers do negotiate changes or addenda. Focus on the most critical clauses (liability, indemnification, data protection). You may not get every change, but Salesforce often will agree to reasonable tweaks, especially if you’re a significant client. Never assume you have to accept the MSA verbatim – prioritize your asks and make the case for each. It’s common to at least get mutual indemnities adjusted and certain risk provisions improved.

Q: What’s the difference between the MSA and the Order Form in practical terms?
A: The MSA is the overarching legal agreement that sets the general terms and conditions for using Salesforce (applicable to all your dealings), whereas an Order Form is a specific purchase agreement for a set of products, quantities, and a term. Think of the MSA as laying out the rules of engagement (like liability limits, usage rights, legal boilerplate), and the Order Form as the actual “deal” – what you’re buying and for how long. The Order Form will reference the MSA, meaning all those MSA terms apply to that purchase. In short: MSA = legal framework, Order Form = business transaction details. You need to understand both because the Order Form tells you what you get and pay, and the MSA tells you under what conditions all that happens.

Q: What if Salesforce refuses to change certain clauses we ask for?
A: It’s not uncommon for Salesforce to push back on changes, especially for smaller deals. Suppose you encounter a hard no on an important issue. In that case, there are a few steps: First, explain why it’s important – tie it to your company policy or a real risk (e.g., “Our cybersecurity policy won’t let us proceed without this change on data breach liability”). Second, consider escalation – involve higher-level executives on both sides if needed. A Salesforce account executive might not have the authority to change legal terms, but Salesforce’s legal or senior sales leadership might, given the right business justification. Third, use leverage – mention that alternative solutions or delaying the project is on the table if you can’t get a workable agreement. Salesforce hates losing deals, so demonstrating that a clause is a deal-breaker can make them revisit their stance. Finally, be willing to compromise if possible: if they won’t, say, make an indemnity fully mutual, maybe they’ll agree to a narrower change that partially addresses your concern. Identify your “must-haves” versus “nice-to-haves” so you know where to stand firm. In any case, if something truly remains non-negotiable and it’s a serious concern, you have to weigh the risk of accepting it versus the benefit of the deal. If you do accept it, do so eyes open and perhaps adjust other parts of the deal (like extra insurance, or a higher discount to offset risk). But often, persistence and creative problem-solving will yield some movement from Salesforce on tough clauses.

Q: Do we need to sign up for Salesforce’s Hyperforce or specific data residency terms separately?
A: Hyperforce isn’t something you “sign up for” like a product; it’s Salesforce’s architecture for deploying instances in various regions. However, if data residency is critical to you, you do need to explicitly negotiate those commitments. In the contract (possibly in the DPA or a custom addendum), state your requirements: e.g., “Salesforce will host Customer’s data in [Australia data centers] for the duration of the subscription” or “All services for Customer will be provisioned in EU-based infrastructure.” Salesforce will then ensure that your organization is deployed accordingly (which may effectively mean using Hyperforce in that region). If you don’t bring it up, Salesforce will provision you according to the standard for your country or industry, which may be fine or may not meet stricter requirements. Additionally, ensure the contract covers related points – for example, who can access the data (support staff location restrictions) and that they won’t move your org to another region without approval. To summarize: you don’t “sign Hyperforce terms” per se, but you do incorporate your data residency and compliance needs into the agreement. Hyperforce is the mechanism Salesforce uses to fulfill such promises, and if it involves any special costs or conditions, those should be delineated clearly. Don’t assume Salesforce will know your compliance needs – spell them out in the contract.

Q: How does negotiating a Salesforce contract relate to our experience negotiating a Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) renewal?
A: Both involve committing to a multi-year enterprise software investment, and in both cases, the vendor’s contract will be written in their favor by default. The strategies you use in a Microsoft EA renewal – such as starting early, knowing your usage, pushing for discounts, and not accepting standard uplifts – absolutely apply to Salesforce. For instance, just as you’d review your Microsoft EA for things like true-up clauses, price lock protections, and exit rights, you should do the same with Salesforce. If you’ve managed to secure good terms with Microsoft (like a cap on price increases or an ability to reduce certain licenses at renewal), use that as a benchmark and confidence boost that you can ask Salesforce for similar consideration. Additionally, lessons learned about volume licensing strategy and EA renewal strategy can strengthen your Salesforce approach: both require understanding your future roadmap (Are you expanding usage or possibly contracting?), assessing alternatives (is there competition in the market?), and aligning internally on must-haves. One big similarity is the need to combat complacency – just as some might blindly renew an EA and miss changes, some blindly renew Salesforce and miss unfavorable terms. So, the diligence and negotiation mindset you apply to Microsoft can and should be applied to Salesforce. On the flip side, be aware of differences: Salesforce’s pricing model is subscription-based per user (with no concept of Software Assurance, since updates are included), and they won’t have the same licensing constructs as Microsoft. But the overarching negotiation principles – optimize licenses, secure best pricing, mitigate compliance risks, and ensure contract flexibility – are universal. Ultimately, negotiating Salesforce is another exercise in vendor management: use all the tools and savvy you’ve developed from other negotiations (Microsoft or otherwise) to drive a fair deal. It’s about not leaving any stone unturned, whether that stone is a legal clause or a pricing detail.

Read about our Salesforce Negotiation Services

Do you want to know more about our Salesforce Negotiation Services?

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.

Name *

Email *

Company

Message *

Submit